UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


(Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant x

[X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [   ]

Check the appropriate box:

[X]       Preliminary Proxy Statement

[   ]       Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

[   ]       Definitive Proxy Statement

[   ]       Definitive Additional Materials

[   ]       Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

o



Check the appropriate box:
xPreliminary Proxy Statement
oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
oDefinitive Proxy Statement
oDefinitive Additional Materials
oSoliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Name of the Registrant as Specified in itsIn Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

xPayment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[XNo fee required.
o[   ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1)(4) and 0-11.

1)1.Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
  
2)2.Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
  
3)3.Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set
(Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
  
4)4.Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
  
5)5.Total fee paid:

o
[   ]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o[   ]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 240-0.110-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
  
1)1.Amount Previously Paid:
  
2)2.Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
  
3)3.Filing Party:
  
4)4.Date Filed:
  

 


WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC.


200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400

Dallas, Texas 75201
November [*], 2014

April 28, 2017

Dear Stockholder:

You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Wilhelmina International, Inc. The Annual Meeting will be held on December 18, 2014,June 13, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at our offices located at 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201.

We describe in detail the actions we expect to submit to a vote of stockholders at the Annual Meeting in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement.

Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own.Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we ask that you promptly sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction card in the envelope provided, or submit your proxy by telephone or over the Internet (if those options are available to you) in accordance with the instructions on the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction card. Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares in person at the Annual Meeting if you desire to do so, as your proxy is revocable at your option before it is exercised at the Annual Meeting.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation for your continued interest in Wilhelmina International, Inc. We look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting.

 Sincerely,
  
 /s/ Mark E. Schwarz
 Mark E. Schwarz
 Chairman of the Board
 and Executive Chairman


 


WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC.


200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400

Dallas, Texas 75201

_________________________________

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 18, 2014

November [*], 2014
JUNE 13, 2017

To the Stockholders of Wilhelmina International, Inc.:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Wilhelmina International, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, will be held on December 18, 2014,June 13, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at ourthe Company’s offices located at 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201, for the following purposes:

1.toTo elect seven directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify;

2.To approve an amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to eliminate any class of preferred stock from the shares of capital stock the Company is authorized to issue;

3.To approve an amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to decrease the number of shares of common stock the Company is authorized to issue from 12,500,000 shares to 9,000,000 shares;

4.To ratify the appointment of Montgomery Coscia Greilich LLP as ourthe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014 (the “Auditor Ratification Proposal”);2017; and

3.5.toTo transact such other business as may properly be broughtcome before the Annual Meeting.Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Information regarding the election of directors and the Auditor Ratification Proposal is provided in the attached Proxy Statement, which we encourage you to read in its entirety before voting.  As determined by the Board of Directors, only stockholders

Stockholders of record at the close of business on November 14, 2014April 21, 2017, are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof.

Your vote is important, regardless of the number of shares that you own.Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we ask that you promptlymeeting, please sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction card in the envelope provided, or submit your proxy by telephone or over the Internet (if those options are available to you) in accordance with the instructions on the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction card.
If you attend the meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote in person.

Thank you for your participation. We look forward to your continued support.

 
By Order of the Board of Directors
  
 /s/ Mark E. Schwarz
 Mark E. Schwarz
 Chairman of the Board
 and Executive Chairman

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholders Meeting To Be Held on June 13, 2017

The 2017 Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2016

are available at www.proxyvote.com.


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Wilhelmina International, Inc. Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on December 18, 2014
 
The Proxy Statement and 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, are available at
http://www.wilhelmina.com/investor-relations.aspx


Table of Contents
Page
Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting1
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management6
Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors7
Directors, Nominees for Election to the Board and Named Executive Officers8
Arrangements Regarding Nomination for Election to the Board11
Transactions with Related Persons14
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings15
Family Relationships Between Directors and Executive Officers15
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance15
Vote Required15
Proposal No. 2 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm16
Fees Billed During Fiscal 2013 and 201216
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures16
Vote Required17
Corporate Governance18
Director Independence18
Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors18
Director Nomination Process20
Board Leadership Structure20
Board Role in Risk Oversight20
Code of Conduct and Ethics21
Stockholder Communications with the Board21
Executive Compensation22
Summary Compensation Table22
Employment Agreements and Arrangements22
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control23
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table23
Director Compensation24
Equity Compensation Plan Information24
Audit Committee Report27
Stockholder Proposals28
Requirements for Stockholder Proposals to be Considered for Inclusion in our Proxy Materials28
Requirements for Stockholder Proposals Outside the Scope of Rule 14a-828
Requirements for Stockholder Nominations of Directors29
Proxy Solicitation29
Annual Report29
Annex AA-1
i


WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC.


200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400

Dallas, Texas 75201


_________________________________

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 13, 2017

This Proxy Statement is furnished by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Wilhelmina International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”), in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on December 18, 2014,June 13, 2017, at our offices located at 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201, at 10:00 a.m., local time, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. This Proxy Statement along with either a proxy card or a voting instruction card, is being mailed to stockholders beginning on or around November 14, 2014.  This Proxy Statement is dated November [*], 2014.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
April 28, 2017.

Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting

Q:Why did I receive this Proxy Statement?

A:The Board is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting because you were a stockholder at the close of business on November 14, 2014,April 21, 2017, the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”), and are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

This Proxy Statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote at the Annual Meeting. You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote your shares.

Q:What information is contained in this Proxy Statement?

A:The information in this Proxy Statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the voting process, the compensation of directors and certain executive officers, and certain other required information.

Q:What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials?

A:You may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this Proxy Statement and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a stockholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive.

Q:What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

A:If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Securities Transfer Corporation (the “Transfer Agent”), you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “stockholder of record.” This Proxy Statement, our 20132016 Annual Report on Form 10-K as amended (the “2013“2016 Annual Report”), and a proxy card have been sent directly to you by the Company.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in street name. This Proxy Statement and the 20132016 Annual Report have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or nominee who is considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card included in the mailing or by following their instructions for voting by telephone or the Internet, if they offer that alternative.  As a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, youInternet. You may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy”proxy from the broker, bank or nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting.

1
 

1

Q:What am I voting on at the Annual Meeting?

A:You are voting on the following matters:

·the electionElection of seven directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify;

·The Auditor Ratification Proposal –An amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate any class of preferred stock from the ratificationshares of capital stock the Company is authorized to issue;

·An amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to decrease the number of shares of common stock the Company is authorized to issue from 12,500,000 shares to 9,000,000 shares;

·Ratification of the appointment of Montgomery Coscia Greilich LLP (“Montgomery Coscia”MCG”) as ourthe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014;2017; and

·theThe transaction of such other business as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting.

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of its director nominees and “FOR” each of the Auditor Ratification Proposal.

other proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

Q:How do I vote?

A:You may vote using any of the following methods:

·
ProxyBy proxy card or voting instruction card. Be sure to complete, sign and date the card and return it in the prepaid envelope.

·
By telephone or the Internet. This is allowed if you are a beneficial owner of shares and your broker, bank or nominee offers this alternative.

·
In person at the Annual Meeting. All record stockholders may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. You may also be represented by another person at the Annual Meeting by executing a proper proxy designating that person. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or nominee and present it to the inspector of election with your ballot when you vote at the Annual Meeting.

Q:What can I do if I change my mind after I vote my shares?

A:If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by:

·sending written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary;

·submitting a new proper proxy dated later than the date of the revoked proxy; or

·attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or nominee. You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting if you obtain a legal proxy as described in the answer to the previous question.from your broker, bank or nominee. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.

2
 

Q:What if I return a signed proxy card, but do not vote for the matters listed on the proxy card?

A:If you return a signed proxy card without indicating your vote, your shares will be voted, in accordance with the Board’s recommendation, as follows: “FOR” the election of each of its director nominees and “FOR” each of the Auditor Ratification Proposal.other proposals described in this Proxy Statement.
2

Q:Can my broker vote my shares for me?

A:Under the rules that govern brokersBrokers and nominees who have record ownership of shares that are held in “street name” (i.e., for account holders (whowho are the beneficial owners of the shares), brokers and nominees have the discretion to vote such shares on routine matters, but not on other matters. Brokers and nominees will have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification of auditors but will not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors but will have discretionary authorityor any of the other proposals described in this Proxy Statement. Please provide voting instructions to vote on the Auditor Ratification Proposal.  Please vote your proxybroker or nominee so your vote can be counted.

Q:Can my shares be voted if I do not return my proxy card or voting instruction card and do not attend the Annual Meeting?

A:If you do not vote your shares held of record (registered directly in your name, not in the name of a broker, bank or nominee), your shares will not be voted.

If your shares are held in street name and you do not voteprovide voting instructions to your shares held beneficially in street name with a broker, bank or nominee, your sharesbroker, bank or nominee may constitutenonetheless submit a proxy reflecting a “broker non-votes.non-vote.” Broker non-votes will be considered present and counted towardsfor purposes of determining a quorum at the Annual Meeting.  However, in tabulating the voting resultMeeting but not for any particular proposal, shares that constituteother purpose. Therefore, broker non-votes are not considered entitled to be voted on that proposal.  Broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of any matter considered at the election of directors or the Auditor Ratification Proposal.

Annual Meeting.

Q:How are votes counted?

A:For the election of directors, you may vote “FOR” all or some of the nominees or your vote may be “WITHHELD” with respect to one or more of the nominees. For the Auditor Ratification Proposalother proposals described in this Proxy Statement, you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” theeach proposal or you may “ABSTAIN” from voting on suchany proposal.

Q:What areis the voting requirements with respectrequirement to approve each of the election of directors?proposals?

A:In the election of directors, each directoryou may vote “FOR” all or some of the nominees or your vote may be “WITHHELD” with respect to one or more of the nominees. You may not cumulate your votes. Thus, a stockholder is not entitled to cumulate his votes and cast them all for any single nominee receivingor to spread his votes, so cumulated, among more than one nominee. Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes of shares present and entitled to votecast at the Annual Meeting will be elected.  You may withhold votes from any or all nominees.Meeting.
Broker non-votes will have no effect on

With respect to each other item of business, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” Approval of each proposed amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation requires the outcomeaffirmative vote of the electionholders of directorsa majority of all issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. For all other matters to be brought before the meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote and represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting.

Meeting (excluding broker non-votes) will decide the question. Therefore, if you “ABSTAIN” with respect to any matter, the abstention has the same effect as a vote “AGAINST.”

Q:How many votes do I have?

A:You are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”) that you hold. As of the Record Date, there were 5,870,3025,381,668 shares of Common Stockour common stock issued and outstanding.

3
 

Q:What happens if a director nominee does not stand for election?

A:If for any reason any nominee does not stand for election, any proxies we receive will be voted in favor of the remainder of the nominees and may be voted for a substitute nomineesnominee in place of thoseany nominee who dodoes not stand. We have no reason to expect that any of the nomineesnominee will not stand for election.

Q:What happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual Meeting?

A:Other than the seven items of business described in this Proxy Statement, we are not aware of any other business to be brought before the Annual Meeting. If you grant a proxy, the person named as proxy holder and John P. Murray will have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

3

Q:How many shares must be present or represented to conduct business at the Annual Meeting?

A:A quorum will be present if at least a majority of the outstanding5,381,668 shares of our Common Stock entitled to vote atcommon stock issued and outstanding as of the Annual Meeting, totaling 2,935,152 shares, isRecord Date, represented at the Annual Meeting, either in person or by proxy.proxy, constitutes a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present, in person or by proxy, the Annual Meeting may be postponed or adjourned from time to time until a quorum is obtained.

Q:How can I attend and vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?

A:You are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting only if you were a stockholder as of the close of business on the Record Date, or you hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting. You should be prepared to present photo identification for admittance. In addition, if you are a stockholder of record, your name will be verified against the list of stockholders of record on the Record Date prior to your being admitted to the Annual Meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares through a broker, bank or nominee (i.e., in street name), and you planmay be required to attend the Annual Meeting, please send written notification to Wilhelmina International, Inc., 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201, Attn: Corporate Secretary, and encloseprovide evidence of your ownership (such as your most recent account statement prior to the Record Date, a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership).  If you do not provide photo identification or comply with the other procedures outlined above, you will not in order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting.
The Annual Meeting will begin promptly on December 18, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., local time.  You should allow adequate time for check-in procedures.

Q:How can I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?

A:Shares held in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted in person at the Annual Meeting. Shares held beneficially in street name may be voted in person at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from the broker, bank or nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy card or voting instruction card as described herein so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

Q:What is the deadline for voting my shares?

A:If you hold shares as the stockholder of record, your vote by proxy must be received before the polls close at the Annual Meeting. If you hold shares beneficially in street name with a broker, bank or nominee, please follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee.
If you hold shares beneficially in street name with a broker, bank or nominee, please follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee.  You may vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting only if at the Annual Meeting you provide a legal proxy obtained from your broker, bank or nominee.

Q:Is my vote confidential?

A:Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within the Company or to third parties, except (a) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, (b) to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote, and (c) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation. Occasionally, stockholders provide written comments on their proxy card, which are then forwarded to our management.

4
 

Q:Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

A:We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

4

Q:How may I obtain a copy of the 20132016 Annual Report and other financial information?

A:A copy of the 20132016 Annual Report is enclosed. Stockholders may request another free copy of the 2016 Annual Report and other financial information by contacting us at:
Stockholders may request another free copy of the 2013 Annual Report and other financial information by contacting us at:

Wilhelmina International, Inc.


200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400

Dallas, Texas 75201

Attention: Corporate Secretary

Alternatively, current and prospective investors can access the 20132016 Annual Report and other financial information at http://www.wilhelmina.com/investor-relations.aspx.

wilhelmina.com/new-york/investor-relations.

We will also furnish any exhibit to the 20132016 Annual Report if specifically requested. Our SEC filings are also available free of charge at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov.

Q:What if I have questions for the Transfer Agent?

A:Please contact the Transfer Agent, at the telephone number or address listed below, with questions concerning stock certificates, transfer of ownership or other matters pertaining to your stock account.

Securities Transfer Corporation


2591 Dallas Parkway, Suite 102

Frisco, Texas 75034

Phone: (469) 633-0101

Q:Who can help answer my questions?

A:If you have any questions about the Annual Meeting or how to vote or revoke your proxy, you should contact us at:

Wilhelmina International, Inc.


200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400

Dallas, Texas 75201

Attention: Corporate Secretary
5


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information regarding the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned on November 14, 2014, the Record Date, by:

 (a)5each person who is known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of the Common Stock;
 
(b)each of our directors, nominees and named executive officers; and
(c)all of our directors, nominees and executive officers as a group.
As of

Proposals to be voted on at the Record Date, 5,870,302 shares of Common Stock were outstanding.  Unless otherwise indicated, the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by a holder includes shares owned by a spouse, minor children and relatives sharing the home of such holder, as well as entities owned or controlled by such holder, and also includes shares underlying options to purchase Common Stock exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.  Except as otherwise set forth below, the address of each of the persons or entities listed in the table is c/o Wilhelmina International, Inc., 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201.

  
Common Stock
 
Name of Beneficial Owner
 
Shares
  %(1) 
5% or Greater Stockholders       
        
Newcastle Partners, L.P.(2)
  2,430,725(3)  41.4 
Horst-Dieter Esch(4)
  1,441,395(5)  24.6 
         
Directors, Nominees and Named Executive Officers        
         
Mark E. Schwarz  2,430,725(6)  41.4 
Alex Vaickus  65,000(7)  * 
John Murray  0   - 
Horst-Dieter Esch  1,441,395(8)  24.6 
Clinton Coleman  0   - 
James Dvorak  0   - 
Mark Pape  0   - 
Jeffrey Utz  0   - 
James Roddey  0   - 
All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (ten persons)  3,937,120(9)  66.4 

 *Less than 1%
(1)Based on 5,870,302 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date.  With the exception of shares that may be acquired by employees pursuant to our 401(k) retirement plan, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of Common Stock that can be acquired within 60 days after the Record Date upon the exercise of options.  Each beneficial owner’s percentage ownership of Common Stock is determined by assuming that options that are held by such person, but not those held by any other person, and that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date have been exercised.

6

(2)The business address of Newcastle Partners, L.P. (“Newcastle”) is 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201.
(3)Consists of shares of Common Stock held by Newcastle, as disclosed in Amendment No. 9 to a Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on June 19, 2014.  Newcastle Capital Management, L.P. (“NCM”), as the general partner of Newcastle, may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by Newcastle. Each of Newcastle Capital Group, L.L.C. (“NCG”), as the general partner of NCM, NCM Services Inc. (“NCM Services”), as the sole member of NCG, the Schwarz 2012 Family Trust (the “Schwarz Trust”), as the sole stockholder of NCM Services, and Mark E. Schwarz, as the sole trustee of the Schwarz Trust, may in each case also be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by Newcastle.  Each of NCM, NCG, NCM Services, the Schwarz Trust and Mr. Schwarz disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Newcastle except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein.
(4)
The business address of Horst-Dieter Esch is Carretera Transpeninsular Km. 27.5, San Jose del Cabo, B.C.S. Mexico 23400.
(5)Consists of 1,423,404 shares of Common Stock held of record by Horst-Dieter Esch and 10,451 shares of Common Stock held of record by Lorex Investment AG (“Lorex”), in each case as reported to the Company by its transfer agent as of November 14, 2014, and 7,540 shares of Common Stock held by Horst-Dieter Esch, as disclosed in a Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership on Form 4 filed with the SEC by Horst-Dieter Esch on June 27, 2014.  Mr. Esch is the sole stockholder of Lorex and shares voting and dispositive power over the shares held by Lorex with Peter Marty, its sole officer and director.
 (6)Consists of 2,430,725 shares of Common Stock held by Newcastle.  Mr. Schwarz may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by Newcastle by virtue of his power to vote and dispose of such shares.  Mr. Schwarz disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Newcastle except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
(7)Includes 60,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options held by Alex Vaickus individually, which are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.
 (8)Consists of 1,430,944 shares of Common Stock held by Horst-Dieter Esch and 10,451 shares of Common Stock held by Lorex.  Mr. Esch is the sole stockholder of Lorex and shares voting and dispositive power over the shares held by Lorex with Peter Marty, its sole officer and director.
(9)Consists of 3,877,120 shares of Common Stock and 60,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options.
annual meeting

PROPOSAL NO. 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

There are seven nominees for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify. All of the nominees currently serve as directors of the Company. Proxies may not be voted with respect to more than seven individuals in the election of directors at the Annual Meeting.


Our Bylaws provide that the number of directors shall be fixed from time to time by the Board, but shall not be less than three.  Each director is elected annually to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies.  

Except where authority to vote for directorsa director has been withheld, it is intended that the proxies received pursuant to this solicitation will be voted “FOR” the nominees named below. If for any reason any nominee does not stand for election, such proxies will be voted in favor of the remainder of the nominees and may be voted for a substitute nomineesnominee in place of thosethe nominee who dodid not stand. We have no reason to expect that any of the nominees will not stand for election. The election of directors will be determined by a plurality of the votes of shares present and entitled to votevoted at the Annual Meeting.

7

Directors,

The Board recommends a vote FOR election of each nominee below.

Nominees for Election to the Board and Named Executive Officers

Information

The following table sets forth information regarding our directors,the nominees and named executive officers, including their ages, current positions with the Company and business experience for the past five years (and, in some instances, for prior years), is set forth below.  All such information has been furnished to us by our directors, nominees and named executive officers.  Additionally, the experiences and skills that ledelection to the conclusion thatBoard at the nominees should serve as directors are discussed below.

Annual Meeting.  

Name
 
Age
 
Positions with the Company
Mark E. Schwarz 5456 Chairman of the BoardDirector and Executive Chairman
Clinton J. Coleman 3740 Director
James A. Dvorak 4548 Director
Horst-Dieter Esch 7174 Director
Mark E. Pape 6466 Director
James C. Roddey 8084 Director
Jeffrey R. Utz 4850 Director
Alex Vaickus55Chief Executive Officer
John Murray45Chief Financial Officer


Mark E. Schwarz

Mr. Schwarz has served as a director and Chairman of the Board since June 2004, and as Executive Chairman since September 2012.  Mr. Schwarz was ourthe Company’s Chief Executive Officer from April 2009 through September2007 to 2012.  He previouslySince 1993, Mr. Schwarz has indirectly controlled Newcastle Partners, L.P. (“Newcastle LP”), a private investment firm, and served as our Interim Chief Executive Officer beginning in October 2007 and was formally appointed our Interim Chief Executive Officer effective in July 2008.  He is the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager of NCM, a private investment management firm he founded in 1993, which is the General Partner ofits general partner, Newcastle a private investment firm.Capital Management, L.P. (“NCM”). Mr. Schwarz has servedpresently serves as Executive Chairman of the Boardboards of directors of Hallmark Financial Services, Inc. (“Hallmark”), a specialty property and casualty insurer, since August 2006.  Heinsurance company, and Rave Restaurant Group, Inc., an operator and franchisor of pizza restaurants. Within the past five years, Mr. Schwarz has served as a director of SL Industries, Inc., a developer of power systems used in a variety of aerospace, computer, datacom, industrial, medical, telecom, transportation and utility equipment applications. He also serves as a director of various privately held companies. The Board believes that Mr. Schwarz should serve as a director of the Company due to his extensive business and investment expertise, broad director experience and significant direct and indirect shareholdings in the Company. (See,Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.)

6

Clinton J. Coleman

Mr. Coleman has served as a director since 2011.  He has since 2010 served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Hallmark from 2003 to August 2006.  He currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Bell Industries, Inc., a company primarily engaged in providing information technology services (“Bell Industries”), and Pizza Inn Holdings, Inc., an operator and franchisor of pizza restaurants (“Pizza Inn”).  He also serves on the board of directors of SL Industries, Inc., a power and data quality products manufacturer.  He previously served on the boards of directors of Nashua Corporation, a manufacturer of specialty papers, labels and printing supplies (“Nashua”), from 2001 to September 2009, MedQuist Inc., a provider of clinical documentation workflow solutions in support of electronic health records, from December 2007 to August 2009, WebFinancial Corporation, a holding company with subsidiaries operating in niche banking markets, from July 2001 to December 2008, and Vesta Insurance Group, Inc., a holding company for a group of insurance companies.

With nearly 20 years of experience as an investment manager and a business executive, Mr. Schwarz brings significant leadership, financial expertise, operational skills and public company board of directors and executive experience to the Board.  Through investments made by NCM and its affiliates, Mr. Schwarz has broad and substantial experience analyzing and advising public companies, including with respect to issues such as corporate governance, capital raising, capital allocation and general operational and business strategy, and has been closely involved in the operations of companies across a range of industries in both director and executive capacities.  As our Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman, Mr. Schwarz is closely involved in all of our operations and activities.

8


Clinton Coleman
Mr. Coleman has served as a director since January 2011.  He has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Bell Industries since January 2010, and has been a director since January 2007.services.  Mr. Coleman has served as an investment professional with NCM since July 2005, including as a Managing Director (June 2012(2012 to present) and Vice President (July 2005 through May(2005 to 2012).  Mr. Coleman previouslyis also a director of Rave Restaurant Group, Inc., and served as the Interimits interim Chief Executive Officer of Pizza Innfrom July 2016 to January 2017 and from June 2012 to November 2012, the Interim Chief Executive Officer of Bell Industries from July 2007 to January 2010 and the Interimserved as its interim Chief Financial Officer of Pizza Inn from July 2006 to January 2007.  Prior to joining NCM, Mr. Coleman served as a portfolio analyst with Lockhart Capital Management, L.P., an investment partnership, from October 2003 to June 2005.  From March 2002 to October 2003, Mr. Coleman served as an associate with Hunt Investment Group, L.P., a private investment group.  Previously, Mr. Coleman was an associate director with the Mergers & Acquisitions Group of UBS.  Mr. Coleman is also a director of Pizza Inn and several privately held companies.  During the past five years,The Board believes that Mr. Coleman also servedshould serve as a director of Nashua.
Mr. Coleman bringsthe Company due to the Board extensivehis experience in investment management and the management of publicly traded and privately held companies engaged in a wide range of industries, including in capacities as director, chief executive officer and chief financial officer.  As an investment banker and investment professional, Mr. Coleman also has a strong background analyzing and advising public companies, as well as his significant transactional experience.

James A. Dvorak

Mr. Dvorak has served as a director since January 2011.  He has served as an investment professional with NCM since January 2008, including as a Managing Director (June 2012(2012 to present) and Vice President (January 2008 through May(2008 to 2012).  Since February 2017, Mr. Dvorak has also served as Senior Vice-President – Investments at Hallmark Financial Services, Inc., a specialty property and casualty insurance company. Mr. Dvorak served as a consultant and subsequently a Senior Investment Analyst with Falcon Fund Management, a Dallas-based investment firm, from September 2006 to December 2007, and as a Vice President with Fagan Capital, an investment firm located in Irving, Texas, from 1999 to June 2006.  Previously, Mr. Dvorak was with Koch Industries, a diversified energy, chemicals and materials provider, as Chief Financial Officer of a business unit and as a board member of a Koch affiliate.  Mr. Dvorak has additional experience as a management consultant with Booz Allen & Hamilton in Chicago, Illinois.

The Board believes that Mr. Dvorak brings nearly 20 yearsshould serve as a director of the Company due to his experience as a business executive, and professional investor.  As ainvestor and management consultant, Mr. Dvorak was involvedincluding expertise in business strategy evaluation and development, newstrategic planning, business development acquisition due diligence, and reorganizations of Fortune 500 businesses.  As a financial executive and investment professional, Mr. Dvorak has developed strong skills in business development, financial and operational analysis, capital structure issues, capital allocation, and strategy development and evaluation.

analysis.

Horst-Dieter Esch

Mr. Esch has served as a director since February 2010. He is a private investor and, since March 2012, has served as the Chairman of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of Snell Real Estate, a leading real estate agency in Las Cabos, Mexico.  SinceFrom 2008 and throughto 2011, he served as the Chairman of USA Team Handball, the national governing body for the Olympic sport of handball. From February 2009 through DecemberDuring 2009, Mr. Esch was a consultant to the Company. Mr. Esch was a principal owner and Chairman of Wilhelmina International, Ltd. (“Wilhelmina International”) and its affiliated companies prior to their sale toacquisition by the Company in February 2009.

9

With over 21 years The Board believes that Mr. Esch should serve as a director of the Company due to his lengthy experience in the model management and artist management businesses, Mr. Esch brings deep experience inbusiness, his familiarity with the Company’s industry tohistory and operations of the Board, together with strongCompany and its predecessor, and his leadership, business strategystrategic planning and business development skills.  Given his long time involvement in the modeling industry, Mr. Esch brings a valuable perspective and industry relationships to the Board.  In addition, as a former principal owner, Chairman and an officer of the operating subsidiaries of the Company, Mr. Esch is strongly familiar with all aspects of their businesses.

Mark E. Pape

Mr. Pape has served as a director since January 2011.  He has served as the Chairman of the boardboards of directors of H2Options, Inc., a start-up water conservation design/installation firm, since September 2009, and U.S. Rain Group, Inc., a private equity company investing in water conservation opportunities, since 2013.  He is also currently a director of Hallmark Financial Services, Inc., a specialty property and casualty insurance company. He served as the Chief Financial Officer of Oryon Technologies, LLC,Inc., a privately-heldlighting technology company, since October 2010.from 2010 to 2014, and as a director from May 2012 to January 2014.  Oryon Technologies, Inc. filed a petition under Chapter 11 of the federal Bankruptcy Code in May 2014. Mr. Pape served as a partner at Tatum LLC, an executive services firm, from August 2008 through Novemberto 2009.  From November 2005 to December 2007, Mr. Papehe served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Affirmative Insurance Holdings, Inc., a publicly-traded property and property/casualty insurance company specializing in non-standard automobile insurance, and served on its board of directors and audit committee from July 2004 to November 2005.  Mr. Pape served as the Chief Financial Officer of HomeVestors of America, Inc., a franchisor of home acquisition services, from September 2005 to November 2005,during 2005; as President and Chief Executive Officer of R.E. Technologies, Inc., a provider of software tools to the housing industry, from April 2002 to May 2005, and2005; as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of LoanCity.com, a start-up e-commerce mortgage bank, from May 1999 to June 2001.2001; as Vice President-Planning for Torchmark Corporation, a life/health insurance holding company, from 1998 to 1999; as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Dental Care, Inc., a dental benefits insurance company, from 1995 to 1997; and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Income Holding, Inc., a life insurance company, from 1991 to 1994. Previously, Mr. Pape was engaged in investment banking from 1979 to 1991 with First City National Bank of Houston, Merrill Lynch Capital Markets Group, the First Boston Corporation and then Bear, Stearns & Co. He began his career in 1974 as an auditor with KPMG LLP. He is a member of the board of directors of Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc.,certified public accountant licensed in Texas. The Board believes that Mr. Pape should serve as a publicly-traded specialty propertydirector due to his leadership and casualty insurance company, from July 2009 through November 2009.

With strong experienceoperational skills developed as a business executive, Mr. Pape brings significant leadership, operational skills and public company board of directors and executive experience to the Board.  In addition, Mr. Pape’s stronghis background in finance and financial services, includingand his significant transactional experience, bolsters the Company’s experience in these areas and will be particularly helpful to the Company as it grows.

Jeffrey Utz
Mr. Utz has been a principal and partner at Diversified Insurance Group, an insurance agency and provider of benefits and risk management consulting services based in Salt Lake City, since July 1998. Prior to Diversified Insurance Group, Mr. Utz worked at Great American Insurance Company, a specialty insurance company, and Fred A. Moreton & Company, an insurance brokerage firm.  Mr. Utz recently completed a term as Chairman of the Board of USA Team Handball and sits on the Board for Workers’ Compensation Certification Institute.
With strong experience as a business executive, Mr. Utz would bring to the Board significant operational, salesdirector of both private and marketing and business strategy skills as well as executive experience and leadership.  At Diversified Insurance Group, Mr. Utz has been an integral part of its growth and expansion, and such experience and insight is expected to be valuable to the Board. In addition, Mr. Utz’s strong background and expertise in risk management also provides an additional competency to the Board.
public companies.


10


James Roddey
7
 

James C. Roddey

Mr. Roddey has served as a director of the Company since November 2013. Mr. RoddeyHe had previously served as a director from January 2011 to September 2013.  He2013 and has been a director of seven publicly traded companies during his career.  Mr. Roddey has served as Principala director of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, an accounting and business advisory firm, since its acquisition of ParenteBeard, LLP (including throughin 2014. He had previously served as Principal-Business Consulting Services of the accounting and advisory firm of ParenteBeard and its predecessor, McCrory & McDowell LLC), a provider of financial, business and management consulting services,LLC, since September 2007.  Mr. Roddey was a Partnerpartner at the Hawthorne Group, an investment and management company, from January 2004 to September 2007 (and previouslyand from 1978 to 2000).  Prior to the Hawthorne Group, from January2000.  From 2000 to January 2004, Mr. Roddeyhe served as the Chief Executive of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.  Mr. Roddey was a director of SEEC, Inc., a software provider for the insurance and financial services industry, from August 2005 to November 2008.  Earlier in his career, Mr. Roddeyhe served as President and a director of Turner Communications, Inc. and Rollins Communication, Inc. and, while associated with the Hawthorne Group, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising, Gateway Outdoor Advertising and International Sports Marketing, among other companies.

Alex Vaickus
Mr. Vaickus has served as our Chief Executive Officer since September 2012.  Mr. Vaickus served as President of Playboy Enterprises Inc. (“PEI”), a media and lifestyle company that markets the Playboy brand through a wide range of media properties and licensing initiatives, from 2009 to 2011 and as President of PEI’s Global Licensing Group from 2000 to 2009.  Mr. Vaickus also served as Executive Vice President (2002-2009) and Senior Vice President (2000-2002) of PEI.  Prior to The Board believes that Mr. Vaickus servedRoddey should serve as PEI’s Vice Presidenta director due to his lengthy executive experience in a variety of Strategic Planning from 1998 to 2000.  industries through which he has developed significant managerial, operational and financial expertise.

Jeffrey R. Utz

Mr. Vaickus previously served as an executive at a division of Conagra Foods, Inc. from 1993 to 1998 and an executive at a division of Sara Lee Corporation from 1981 to 1993.

John Murray
Mr. MurrayUtz has served as our Chief Financial Officer since June 2004 and served as a director from February 2009 through January 2011.  Mr. Murrayof the Company since 2013. Since December 2015, he has served as the Chief Financial Officeran Area President of NCM since January 2003.Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., an international provider of property/casualty insurance and risk management programs. From 1995 until 2002,1978 to 2015, Mr. MurrayUtz was a Certified Public Accountant engaged inprincipal and owner of Silver King Insurance Holdings, Inc., an insurance agency and provider of benefits and risk management consulting services. Previously, he worked at Great American Insurance Company, a specialty insurance company, and Fred A. Moreton & Company, an insurance brokerage firm.  The Board believes that Mr. Utz should serve as a director due to his own private practice in Dallas, Texas.  From 1991 until 1995, Mr. Murray servedexperience as an accountant with Ernst & Young, LLP.  Mr. Murray has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1992.business executive, including his leadership, operational, sales and marketing and business strategy skills, as well as his risk management expertise.

8
 

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of the Company’s directors and executive officers.

Arrangements Regarding Nomination for Election toof Directors

In 2008, Mr. Esch and his affiliate, Lorex Investments AG (collectively, the Board 

Pursuant to a mutual support agreement (as amended, the “Mutual Support Agreement”“Esch Parties”) entered into in connection with our acquisition of Wilhelmina International and certain of its affiliates (the “Acquisition”) in February of 2009,  Newcastle, Esch, Lorex,, Brad Krassner and Mr. Krassner’shis affiliate, Krassner Family Investments Limited Partnership (“Krassner L.P.”(collectively the “Krassner Parties”) and together with Mr. Esch, Lorex and Mr. Krassner, the “Control Sellers”) agreed that, among other things, each of the parties would (a) use their commercially reasonable efforts to cause their representatives serving on the Board to vote to nominate and recommend the election of their designees and, in the event the Board will appoint directors without stockholder approval, to use their commercially reasonable efforts to cause their representatives on the Board to appoint their designees to the Board, (b) vote their shares of common stock to elect their designees at any meeting of our stockholders or pursuant to any action by written consent in lieu ofNewcastle LP entered into a meeting pursuant to which directors are to be elected to the Board, and (c) not to propose, and to vote their shares of common stock against, any amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, or the adoption of any other corporate measure, that frustrates or circumvents the provisions of the Mutual Support Agreement with respect to the election of their designees.

11

In Octoberdirectors to the Board. The Mutual Support Agreement was subsequently amended in 2010 Newcastle andto provide for the Control Sellers entered into an Amendmentelection of independent directors. The Krassner Parties ceased to have any rights or obligations under the Mutual Support Agreement (the “MSA Amendment”(as amended, the “MSA”) forupon becoming the purposebeneficial owner of providing a procedure for the nomination, election and removal of independent membersless than 5% of the Board. Pursuant to the MSA Amendment, the parties agreed (a) to cause their representatives serving on the Board to vote to nominate and recommend the election of (i) one individual (the “NP Independent Representative”) selected by Messrs. Esch and Krassner from a list of at least four Qualifying Unaffiliated Individuals (as defined below) pre-approved by Newcastle (two of whom are required to be Enhanced QUIs (as defined below)) and (ii) one individual (the “Seller Independent Representative” and together with the NP Independent Representative, the “Independent Designees”) selected by Newcastle from a list of at least four Qualifying Unaffiliated Individuals pre-approved by Messrs. Esch and Krassner (two of whom are required to be Enhanced QUIs) and, in the event the Board will appoint directors without stockholder approval, to cause their representatives on the Board to appoint applicable Independent Designee(s) to the Board (including to fill any vacancy caused by the death, incapacity, resignation or removal of an applicable Independent Designee), (b) to vote theiroutstanding shares of common stock to elect the Independent Designees at any meeting of the Company’s stockholders or pursuant to any action by written consentcommon stock in lieu of meeting pursuant to which directors are to be elected to the Board, and (c) to vote against and not to propose the removal of either Independent Designee unless both parties vote for such removal.

For purposes of the MSA Amendment, (a) a “Qualifying Unaffiliated Individual” generally means an individual that (i) meets the director independence standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”), (ii) is not an affiliate of the parties or the Company or a holder of 5% or more of any class of equity interests in the parties or any of their affiliates (other than the Company) and (iii) has or maintains no Economic Relationship (as defined below) with any of the parties, the Company or any affiliate thereof, (b) an individual is generally considered to have an “Economic Relationship” with another person if such individual (or any affiliate thereof) receives (or has received in the prior five years) a material direct financial benefit from such other person (e.g., material salary or fees, material contractual payments under a commercial contract, equity or debt investment proceeds, etc.), (c) an “Enhanced QUI” generally means an individual that (i) meets the Qualifying Unaffiliated Individual standard and, in addition, (ii) is not a Close Long Time Personal Friend (as defined below) of the party pre-approving such individual, (d) a “Close Long Time Personal Friend” of a pre-approving party generally means an individual who has had Meaningful Social Contact (as defined below) on at least a monthly basis for at least ten months out of every year starting 1990 or earlier up to the present with Messrs. Krassner or Esch (if Messrs. Krassner and Esch are the pre-approving parties) or with Messrs. Schwarz or Murray or Evan Stone (if Newcastle is the pre-approving party), and (e) “Meaningful Social Contact” generally means in-person, pre-arranged (between the relevant principals and the Close Long Time Personal Friend) social contact that is one-on-one or involves a group of no more than 10 people and which (i) focuses principally on non-professional and non-business related topics and (ii) occurs in a non-professional setting (e.g., residential setting, restaurant, etc.); provided that, without limitation, (A) any spontaneous contact (e.g., “running into” each other) in any location (whether or not occurring with frequency) and (B) contact occurring in larger group social setting or event not organized by a relevant principal or the Close Long Time Personal Friend or spouse of either or Close Long Time Personal Friend of both (e.g., a party at a third party’s home or club, a class, football game, concert, etc.) are expressly excluded as “Meaningful Social Contact.”
Pursuant to the MSA Amendment, the parties agreed to an annual selection process with respect to the Independent Designees.  Under the MSA Amendment, a list of pre-approved nominees meeting the applicable standards is required to be delivered to the other party with respect to each Annual Meeting of Stockholders thereafter, no later than the date that is 75 calendar days prior to the mailing date of the proxy statement for the prior year’s annual meeting.2012. The MSA Amendment also contains procedures for the re-nomination of Independent Designees who were previously appointed or elected to the Board in lieu of the annual selection process.
12

The obligations of the parties under the Mutual Support Agreementwill terminate upon the earlier of (a) the written agreement of all of the remaining parties, or (b) either the date on which twoEsch Parties or Newcastle LP becoming the beneficial owner of the three groups of parties to the Mutual Support Agreement (Mr. Esch and his affiliates as one group, Mr. Krassner and his affiliates as another group, and Newcastle as another group) each owns less than 5% of the common stock outstanding. On July 31, 2012, Krassner L.P. disposed of shares of our Common Stock in an amount which resulted in Mr. Krassner and his affiliates beneficially owning less than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock.  Accordingly, Mr. Krassner ceased to have rights and obligations under the termscommon stock of the Mutual Support Agreement, including any rightCompany.

Pursuant to designatethe MSA, the Esch Parties and Newcastle LP have agreed to use their commercially reasonable efforts (including the voting of all of their shares) to cause the Board to at all times be comprised of seven directors which include (a) three persons designated by Newcastle LP, (b) one person designated by Mr. Esch, (c) one additional person designated by Newcastle LP from a directorlist of four independent candidates proposed by Mr. Esch, and (d) one additional person designated by Mr. Esch from a list of four independent candidates proposed by Newcastle LP. The MSA contains detailed provisions concerning the characteristics of the independent candidates to be proposed by each of Mr. Esch and Newcastle LP for selection by the other.

Messrs. Schwarz, Coleman and Dvorak have been elected to the Board to jointly selectas designees of Newcastle LP under the NP Independent Representative from a list pre-approved by Newcastle or to jointly pre-approve a list of nominees from which the Seller Independent Representative is selected by Newcastle.  Mr. Krassner also resigned as a member of the Board on September 20, 2012.MSA and Mr. Esch maintains his rights and obligations under the Mutual Support Agreement, including the right to designate a directorhas been elected to the Board to select the NP Independent Representative from a list pre-approved by Newcastle and to pre-approve a list of nominees from which the Seller Independent Representative is selected by Newcastle.  


as his own designee. In connection with the closing of the Acquisition in 2009, Newcastle designated Mr. Schwarz as a Board designee of Newcastleaddition, pursuant to the Mutual Support Agreement.  In February 2010,MSA, Mr. Utz has been elected to the Board appointedas an independent director proposed by Mr. Esch to serve as a director following his designation of himself as Board designee pursuantand designated by Newcastle LP and Mr. Pape has been elected to the Mutual Support Agreement.  Mark Pape (selected from a list pre-approved by Newcastle) and James Roddey (selected from a list pre-approved by Messrs. Esch and Krassner) were first selected as the Independent Designees for the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting held in January 2011.  In addition, effective upon the date of the 2011 Annual Meeting, Newcastle designated Messrs. Coleman and Dvorak as its designees pursuant to the Mutual Support Agreement (replacing earlier Newcastle designees John Murray and Evan Stone).  For the Company’s 2013 Annual Meeting held in September 2013, Mr. Esch determined not to re-nominate Mr. RoddeyBoard as an Independent Designee, and Mr. Utz was selectedindependent director proposed by Newcastle from a list pre-approvedLP and designated by Mr. Esch. Mr. Roddey was subsequently re-appointedinitially elected to the Board as an independent director proposed by Mr. Esch and designated by Newcastle LP, but was not re-proposed by Mr. Esch for election at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. However, in November 2013, and does not currently serve on the Board pursuantelected Mr. Roddey as a director to fill the Mutual Support Agreement.

Althoughvacancy previously created by the resignation of Mr. Krassner in September 2012.

PROPOSALS NO. 2 & 3 – INTRODUCTION

The Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company presently authorize the issuance of 22,500,000 shares of capital stock consisting of 12,500,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. On April 4, 2017, the Board unanimously adopted resolutions proposing amendments of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company to (a) eliminate any class of preferred stock from the shares of capital stock the Company is notauthorized to issue (the “Preferred Stock Elimination Amendment”), and (b) reduce the number of shares of common stock. $0.01 par value per share, that the Company is authorized to issue to 9,000,000 shares (the “Common Stock Reduction Amendment”). The primary purpose of each proposed amendment is to reduce the Company’s annual Delaware franchise tax liability. Under Delaware law, each amendment must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a partymajority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock.

9

The Preferred Stock Elimination Amendment and the Common Stock Reduction Amendment are each independent of the other. Neither proposed amendment is conditioned upon shareholder approval of the other proposed amendment. However, for illustrative purposes only, if both the Preferred Stock Elimination Amendment and the Common Stock Reduction Amendment were to the Mutual Support Agreement,be approved by shareholders and implemented by the Board, unanimously approved the nominationRestated Articles of eachIncorporation of the designees thereunder for electionCompany would be amended by deleting Article 4.2 in its entirety and replacing Article 4.1 with the following Article 4.1:

“4.1Total Number of Shares of Stock. The total number of shares of all classes of stock that the corporation shall have authority to issue is nine million (9,000,000) shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (‘Common Stock’).”

The Board recommends a vote FOR both Proposal No. 2 approving the Board at this Annual Meeting.


In addition toPreferred Stock Elimination Amendment and Proposal No. 3 approving the obligations set forth above,Common Stock Reduction Amendment.

PROPOSAL NO. 2 – APPROVAL OF THE PREFERRED STOCK ELIMINATION AMENDMENT

Article 4.1 of the parties also agreed under the MSA Amendment (a) to vote against and not to propose any amendment to the CertificateRestated Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws or the adoption of any other corporate measure that (A) reduces or fixes the size of the Board below seven directors or increases or fixesCompany presently authorizes the sizeissuance of 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. Article 4.2 of the Board in excessRestated Articles of seven directors or (B) provides that directors shall be elected other than on an annual basis and (b) not to seek to advise, encourage or influence (or form, join or in any way participate in any “group” or act in concert with) any other person with respect to the voting of any Company voting securities inconsistent with the foregoing.  Pursuant to the MSA Amendment, the parties also agreed that, so long as the Mutual Support Agreement remains in effect, the parties will cause their representatives onIncorporation authorizes the Board to votecreate and issue series of such preferred stock and to maintainfix the sizenumber of theshares, powers, designations, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of each such series of preferred stock.

The Board at seven directors, unless otherwise agreed to by the respective Board designeespreviously filed a Certificate of the parties.


13

Transactions with Related Persons
Transactions with Newcastle and its Affiliates
Our corporate headquarters are currently located at 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201, which is also an office of NCM.  Pursuant to an oral agreement, we previously occupied a portion of NCM’s office space on a month-to-month basis at no charge, and received accounting and administrative services from employees of NCM at no charge.  Effective October 1, 2006, the parties formalized this arrangement by executing a services agreement.  Pursuant to the services agreement, we continue to occupy a portion of NCM’s office space on a month-to-month basis at $2,500 per month and incur additional fees to NCM for accounting and administrative services provided by employees of NCM.  During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we incurred fees (including the payments for the NCM office space) of approximately $30,000 and $30,000, respectively, under the services agreement.
Newcastle is party to a registration rights agreementDesignation in accordance with the Company pursuant to which it holds certain demandRestated Articles of Incorporation and piggyback registration rights with respect to the CommonDelaware law creating a class of 1,000,000 shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock it holds, including Common Stock issued to Newcastle under a purchase agreement entered into by Newcastle and the Company in August 25, 2008 for the purpose of obtaining financing to complete the Acquisition.
Mr. Schwarz, our Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board, is the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager of NCM, which is the General Partner of Newcastle.  Mr. Murray, our Chief Financial Officer, is the Chief Financial Officer of NCM.   Messrs. Coleman and Dvorak, who each serve on our Board, are Managing Directors of NCM.

Transactions with Messrs. Esch and Krassner 
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had paid to the Control Sellers approximately $676,000 in respect of certain earn-out obligationsissuable in connection with our former shareholder rights plan. However, the Acquisition relatingshareholder rights plan has expired by its terms and no shares of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock or any other class of preferred stock authorized by the Restated Articles of Incorporation have ever been issued. The Preferred Stock Elimination Amendment would eliminate the presently designated Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock and remove the Board’s authority to create or issue any other series of preferred stock.

The primary purpose of the Preferred Stock Elimination Amendment is to reduce the Company’s annual Delaware franchise tax liability. Eliminating the authorized preferred stock would also protect the interests of holders of the common stock by precluding the Board from creating and issuing a class of preferred stock with rights, privileges and preferences senior to the operating results of Wilhelmina Miami (defined herein ascommon stock.

Under Delaware law, the “Miami Earnout”).  During March 2013,Preferred Stock Elimination Amendment must be approved by the Company offset approximately $454,000affirmative vote of the Company’s remaining approximately $509,000 Miami Earnout obligation (asholders of December 31, 2012) for losses incurred by the Company in the settlementa majority of the foreign withholding claims for tax years 2006issued and 2008, leaving a balance of approximately $55,000 which is owed under the Miami Earnout obligation.


Mr. Esch and Lorex (together with Mr. Krassner and Krassner L.P.) are parties to a registration rights agreement entered into in connection with the Acquisition, pursuant to which such parties, among others, hold certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to the Common Stock issued to them in connection with the Acquisition.
Mr. Esch provides a personal guaranteeoutstanding shares of our corporate American Express card.

Review, Approval or Ratificationcommon stock. Even if approved by shareholders, the Board retains the discretionary authority not to file Articles of Transactions with Related Persons
14


The Board reviews all relationships and transactions withAmendment implementing the Company in which our directors and executive officers or their immediate family members are participantsPreferred Stock Elimination Amendment if it subsequently determines that to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest.  The Board is primarily responsible for the development and implementation of processes and controls to obtain information from the directors and executive officers with respect to related person transactions and for then determining, based on the facts and circumstances, whether the Company or a related person has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction.  As required under SEC rules, transactions that are determined todo so would not be directly or indirectly material to us or a related person are disclosed in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K and our proxy statements with respect to the election of directors.  In addition, the Audit Committee reviews and approves or ratifies any related person transaction that is required to be disclosed.  In the course of its review and approval or ratification of a related party transaction to be disclosed, the Audit Committee considers: (i) the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction, (ii) the material terms of the transaction, including, without limitation, the amount and type of transaction, (iii) the importance of the transaction to the related person, (iv) the importance of the transaction to the Company, (v) whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a director or executive officer to act in the best interestinterests of the Company and (vi) any other mattersits shareholders.

Approval of the Audit Committee deems appropriate.Preferred Stock Elimination Amendment is separate from, and not conditioned upon approval of, the Common Stock Reduction Amendment described in Proposal No. 3 below. For illustrative purposes only, if only the Preferred Stock Elimination Amendment were to be approved by shareholders and implemented by the Board, Article 4.2 of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company would be deleted in its entirety and Article 4.1 would be replaced by the following Article 4.1:

10
 
Any member

“4.1Total Number of Shares of Stock. The total number of shares of all classes of stock that the corporation shall have authority to issue is twelve million five hundred thousand (12,500,000) shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (‘Common Stock’).”

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal No. 2 approving the Preferred Stock Elimination Amendment.

PROPOSAL NO. 3 – APPROVAL OF THE COMMON STOCK REDUCTION AMENDMENT

Article 4.1 of the Board who is a related person with respectRestated Articles of Incorporation of the Company presently authorizes the issuance of 12,500,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share. The Common Stock Reduction Amendment would reduce the number of shares of our common stock authorized for issuance to a transaction under review maytotal of 9,000,000 shares. The Common Stock Reduction Amendment would not participateaffect the par value of our common stock or make any change to shares of our common stock which are presently issued (whether outstanding or in treasury). The primary purpose of the Common Stock Reduction Amendment is to reduce the Company’s annual Delaware franchise tax liability.

Under Delaware law, the Common Stock Reduction Amendment must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. Even if approved by shareholders, the Board retains the discretionary authority not to file Articles of Amendment implementing the Common Stock Reduction Amendment if it subsequently determines that to do so would not be in the deliberations or vote respecting approval or ratificationbest interests of the transaction, provided, however, that such director may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at a meetingCompany and its shareholders

Approval of the Board or committee that considers the transaction.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
We are engaged in various legal proceedings that are routine in natureCommon Stock Reduction Amendment is separate from, and incidental to our business.  None of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, are believed, in our opinion, to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or our results of operations.
Family Relationships Between Directors and Executive Officers
There are no family relationships among the Company’s directors, nominees or executive officers.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a)not conditioned upon approval of, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file withPreferred Stock Elimination Amendment described in Proposal No. 2 above. For illustrative purposes only, if only the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our Common Stock Reduction Amendment were to be approved by shareholders and other equity securities.  Such persons are requiredimplemented by SEC regulations to furnish us with copiesthe Board, Article 4.2 of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company would remain intact and Article 4.1 would be replaced by the following Article 4.1:

“4.1Total Number of Shares of Stock. The total number of shares of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

Based solely onclasses of stock that the corporation shall have authority to issue is nineteen million (19,000,000). Of such shares, (i) nine million (9,000,000) shall be common stock, par value $0.01 per share (‘Common Stock’), and (ii) ten million (10,000,000) shall be preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (‘Preferred Stock’).”

The Board recommends a review ofvote FOR Proposal No. 3 approving the copies of the Section 16(a) reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, we believe that our directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements during fiscal year 2013.

Vote Required
A plurality of the votes of shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required for the election of each of the nominees.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR”
THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES.
15

Common Stock Reduction Amendment.

PROPOSAL NO. 24 - RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has appointed Montgomery Coscia Greilich LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.2017. Although the selection of Montgomery CosciaMCG does not require ratification, the Board has directed that the appointment of Montgomery CosciaMCG be submitted to stockholders for ratification due to the significance of their appointment to the Company. If stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Montgomery CosciaMCG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee will consider the appointment of other certified public accountants. A representative of Montgomery Coscia will notMCG is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting.

Fees Billed During Fiscal 2013 and 2012
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Montgomery Coscia for professional services required for the audit of our annual financial statements included in our 2013 Annual Report and the review of the interim financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and other services that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements, was $141,750 and $166,418 for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees
We did not engage or pay Montgomery Coscia for assurance and related services in fiscal years 2013 and 2012.
Tax Fees
Professional services relating to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning paid to Montgomery Coscia was $66,514 and $52,176 for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, respectively.
All Other Fees
Other than the services described above, we did not engage or pay Montgomery Coscia for services in fiscal years 2013 and 2012.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
All audit servicesMeeting, to be performed by ouravailable to respond to appropriate questions and to have an opportunity to make a statement.

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal No. 4 ratifying the selection of MCG as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee.  Consistent with applicable law, limited amounts of services, other than audit, review or attest services, may be approved by one or more members of the Audit Committee pursuant to authority delegated by the Audit Committee, provided each such approved service is reported to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting.for fiscal year 2017.

11
 
All of the audit engagements and fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.  In connection with the audit of our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, Montgomery Coscia only used full-time, permanent employees.

16

The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision by Montgomery Coscia of the services covered by the fees other than the audit fees is compatible with maintaining Montgomery Coscia’s independence and believes that it is compatible.

Vote Required
The approval of the Auditor Ratification Proposal will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF MONTGOMERY COSCIA GREILICH, LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2014.
17

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Director Independence
Annually, as well as in connection with the election or appointment of a new director to the Board, the Board considers the business and charitable relationships between it and each director.  The Board determines whether directors are “independent” under Nasdaq’s listing standards.  The Board determined that Mark Pape,  James Roddey, Jeffrey Utz and Dieter Esch are independent under Nasdaq’s listing standards.  Mr. Schwarz is not independent under Nasdaq’s listing standards.  With respect to 2013, the Board has not made a determination regarding the independence of Messrs. Coleman or Dvorak. The Audit Committee is comprised of Messrs. Pape (Chairman), Roddey and Utz, all of whom are independent under Nasdaq’s listing standards applicable to Audit Committee members.  The Compensation Committee is also composed of Messrs. Pape, Roddey (Chairman) and Utz. The Company does not have a separately-designated Nominating Committee at this time.
Under Nasdaq rules, a “controlled company” is a company in which 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, group or another company.  Newcastle, Mr. Schwarz, Lorex, and Mr. Esch, who together control in excess of the 50% of the Company’s voting power for the election of directors, are filing parties to a Schedule 13D/A filed on June 19, 2014.   Accordingly, the Company believes that greater than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors of the Company is held by a group, and the Company is a “controlled company” within Nasdaq’s rules.  In reliance on a “controlled company” exception, the Company does not maintain a separate nominating committee.  The Company nevertheless at this time maintains a full Board comprised of a majority of independent directors and fully independent audit and compensation committees.  The Company may in the future determine to rely on the “controlled company” exception in respect of certain other Nasdaq governance requirements, including majority board independence.
Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board met three times and acted by written consent two times during 2013.  Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (a) the total number of meetings of the Board (held during the period for which he has been a director) and (b) the total number of meetings of all committees of the Board on which he served (during the periods that he served).  Three of the Company’s incumbent directors were present at the Company’s prior Annual Meeting of Stockholders.  Each director is expected to make reasonable efforts to attend meetings of the Board, meetings of the committees of which he is a member and the annual meetings of stockholders.
The Board currently has a separately-designated Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act and Compensation Committee, but does not have a separately-designated Nominating Committee.  The Audit Committee met four times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.  The Compensation Committee met two times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee, among other things, meets with our independent registered public accounting firm and management representatives, recommends to the Board appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm, approves the scope of audits and other services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, considers whether the performance of any professional services by the independent registered public accounting firm other than services provided in connection with the audit function could impair the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviews the results of audits and the accounting principles applied in financial reporting and financial and operational controls.  The independent registered public accounting firm has unrestricted access to the Audit Committee and vice versa.
18

The incumbent Audit Committee is comprised of Mark Pape (chairman), James Roddey and Jeffrey Utz, each of whom is independent as independence for audit committee members is defined under the listing standards of Nasdaq.  The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Pape, Roddey and Utz each qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under the Exchange Act.  The Board has adopted a written Charter of the Audit Committee, which is available at http://www.wilhelmina.com/investor-relations.aspx.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee determines policies and procedures relating to compensation and employee stock and other benefit plans of key executives and approval of individual salary adjustments and stock awards.  Compensation is determined pursuant to discussions and analysis by the Compensation Committee based on certain factors that may include a review of the individual’s performance, the scope of responsibility for the applicable position, the experience level necessary for the applicable position, certain peer group compensation levels and the performance of the Company.  The Executive Chairman makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the amount and form of compensation for the Company’s key executives, based on comparable factors, and the Compensation Committee takes such recommendations into account in its review.
The incumbent Compensation Committee is comprised of James Roddey (chairman), Mark Pape and Jeffrey Utz, each of whom is independent under the listing standards of Nasdaq.  The Board has adopted a written Charter of the Compensation Committee at this time.  The Board has adopted a written Charter of the Compensation Committee, which is available at http://www.wilhelmina.com/investor-relations.aspx.
Full Board Serving Function of Nominating Committee
The Company’s full Board currently serves the function of a nominating committee.  Because the Company qualifies as a controlled company under Nasdaq rules, the Company is not required to have a separate nominating committee. The Board also believes it is appropriate for the Company not to have a nominating committee at this time because, pursuant to the Mutual Support Agreement, as amended (as further described under the section of this Proxy Statement titled, Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors–Arrangements Regarding Nomination for Election to the Board), stockholders holding approximately 65% of our outstanding shares have agreed (a) to maintain the size of the Board at seven directors and (b) to cause their representatives on the Board to vote to nominate (i) a total of four nominees directly designated by such holders and (ii) an additional two nominees as determined through an annual selection process pursuant to which each side selects a nominee from a list of independent candidates pre-approved by the other side.  Consequently, as a practical matter, the nomination of directors to the Board will be controlled by certain of our stockholders for the foreseeable future.  The Board will consider establishing a nominating committee and adopting a nominating committee charter in the future.
19


Director Nomination Process
Members of the Board who are parties to the Mutual Support Agreement identify prospective candidates to serve as directors, review candidates’ credentials and qualifications, and interview prospective candidates, in accordance with the terms of the Mutual Support Agreement, as amended.  Subject to the terms of the Mutual Support Agreement, as amended, the members of the Board also consider and discuss other stockholder recommendations for director nominees.  Recommendations for director nominees may come from a wide variety of sources, including stockholders, business contacts, community leaders, other third-party sources and members of management.  The Board will initially evaluate any such prospective nominee on the basis of his or her resume and other background information that has been made available to the Board and follow up with the prospective nominee.  Except with respect to nominations in accordance with the Mutual Support Agreement, as amended, the Board does not anticipate that the Company will differentiate evaluating nominees based on the source of their nomination.  While the Board will consider candidates recommended by stockholders as discussed above, it has not adopted formal procedures to be followed by stockholders for submitting such recommendations in light of the nomination provisions of the Mutual Support Agreement, which provides for identification and selection procedures with respect to all but one seat on the Board at this time.
The Board seeks to attract director nominees of personal integrity whose diversity of business background and experience will represent the interests of all stockholders.  There is no firm requirement of minimum qualifications or skills that candidates must possess.  Director candidates are evaluated based on a number of qualifications, including their judgment, leadership ability, expertise in the industry, experience developing and analyzing business strategies, financial literacy and risk management skills.

Corporate Governance

Board Leadership Structure

Our governing documents provide the Board with flexibility to determine the appropriate leadership structure for the Board and the Company, including but not limited to whether it is appropriate to separate the roles of our Chairman of the Board and our PrincipalChief Executive Officer. In making these determinations, the Board considers numerous factors, including the specific needs and strategic direction of the Company and the size and membership of the Board at the time.

The Board is led by

Mark E. Schwarz serves as the Executive Chairman of the Company. In such capacity, he functions as both the chairman of the Board Mr. Schwarz, who in his capacityand an executive officer with responsibilities for corporate strategy, capital allocation and business acquisitions. William J. Wackermann serves as the President and Chief Executive Chairman also continues to serve as our Principal Executive Officer.  The Board doesOfficer of the Company but is not have a lead independent director. The Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate because it permits Mr. Schwarz is best suited to serve as Chairmanprovide Board leadership independent of operational management, while still providing the Company the benefit of his business and investment expertise. As a result, the Board believes that all directors are able to objectively evaluate the management and operations of the Board due to his knowledge and experience as our former Chief Executive Officer and his relevant experience analyzing and advising public companies, including with respect to issues such as corporate governance, capital raising, capital allocation and general operational and business strategy.  A majority of theCompany. The Board also believes that, continuing to combineas a result of his significant beneficial ownership of Common Stock, Mr. Schwarz’s role as Executive Chairman enhances the positions of Chairmanfocus of the Board on building stockholder value. (See,Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Principal Executive Officer is the most effective leadership structure for the Company at this time, due to the small size of our management team and because the combined position enhances Mr. Schwarz’s ability to provide insight and direction on strategic initiatives to both management and the Board.   While Mr. Schwarz serves as Executive Chairman and as the Company’s Principal Executive Officer, the Company hired Alex Vaickus as Chief Executive Officer in 2012 and expects Mr. Vaickus to continue to assume greater responsibilities and ultimately the role of Principal Executive Officer.

Management.)

Board Role in Risk Oversight

Senior management is responsible for assessing and managing the Company’s various exposures to risk on a day-to-day basis, including the creation of appropriate risk management programs and policies. The Board is responsible for overseeing management in the execution of its responsibilities and for assessing the Company’s approach to risk management. The Board exercises these responsibilities periodically as part of its meetings, at which the Board regularly discusses areas of material risk to the Company (including operational, financial, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational risks), and at meetings of the Audit Committee. In addition, an overall review of risk is inherent in the Board’s consideration of the Company’s long-term strategies and in the transactions and other matters presented to the Board, including capital expenditures, acquisitions and divestitures, and financial matters.

Director Independence

Annually, as well as in connection with the election or appointment of a new director to the Board, the Board considers the Company’s business and other relationships with each director.  The Board determines whether directors are “independent” under Nasdaq’s listing standards.  The Board has determined that Messrs. Esch, Pape, Roddey and Utz are independent under Nasdaq’s listing standards. The Board has determined that Messrs. Schwarz, Coleman and Dvorak are not independent under Nasdaq’s listing standards.

12
 
20

Code

Meetings and Committees of Conduct and Ethics

Effective April 15, 2009, the Board adoptedof Directors

The Board met six times during 2016 and also approved various matters by unanimous written consent. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (a) the total number of meetings of the Board, and (b) the total number of meetings of all committees of the Board on which he served. The Company has no policy with respect to directors attending the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. One of the incumbent directors was present at the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Board currently has a revised Codeseparately-designated Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, but does not have a separately-designated Nominating Committee. The Audit Committee met six times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. The Compensation Committee did not meet during 2016 but approved certain matters by unanimous written consent.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee, among other things, meets with our independent registered public accounting firm and management representatives, recommends to the Board appointment of Business Conductan independent registered public accounting firm, approves the scope of audits and Ethicsother services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, considers whether the performance of any professional services by the independent registered public accounting firm other than services provided in connection with the audit function could impair the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviews the results of audits and the accounting principles applied in financial reporting and financial and operational controls. The independent registered public accounting firm has unrestricted access to the Audit Committee and vice versa.

The incumbent Audit Committee is comprised of Mark E. Pape (chairman), James C. Roddey and Jeffrey R. Utz, each of whom is independent as independence for audit committee members is defined under the listing standards of Nasdaq. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Pape, Roddey and Utz each qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Code of Ethics”“Exchange Act”). The CodeBoard has adopted a written Charter of Ethicsthe Audit Committee, which is available at http://www.wilhelmina.com/investor-relations.aspx.wilhelmina.com/new-york/investor-relations.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee determines policies and procedures relating to compensation, employee stock options and other benefit plans of executive officers and other key employees. Compensation is determined pursuant to discussions and analysis by the Compensation Committee based on factors that may include a review of the individual’s performance, the scope of responsibility for the applicable position, the experience level necessary for the applicable position, certain peer group compensation levels and the performance of the Company. The Executive Chairman makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the amount and form of compensation for the Company’s executive officers and other key employees and the Compensation Committee takes such recommendations into account in its review.

The incumbent Compensation Committee is comprised of James C. Roddey (chairman), Mark E. Pape and Jeffrey R. Utz, each of whom is independent under the listing standards of Nasdaq. The Board has adopted a written Charter of the Compensation Committee, which is available at http://wilhelmina.com/new-york/investor-relations.

13
 

Full Board Serving Function of Nominating Committee

The Company qualifies as a “controlled company” under Nasdaq rules. In reliance on an exemption to Nasdaq rules for a controlled company, the Company does not maintain a separate nominating committee or require that independent directors comprising a majority of the board select nominees for director.

The Company’s full Board currently serves the function of a nominating committee. The Board believes it is appropriate for the Company not to have a nominating committee at this time because, pursuant to the MSA, stockholders holding approximately 64.4% of our outstanding shares have agreed to use their commercially reasonable efforts (including the voting of all of their shares) to cause the Board to at all times be comprised of seven directors which include (a) a total of four nominees directly designated by such holders, and (b) an additional two independent nominees pre-approved by the other party to the MSA. (See,Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors – Arrangements Regarding Election of Directors.) Consequently, as a practical matter, the election of directors to the Board will be controlled by these stockholders for the foreseeable future.

Director Nomination Process

Members of the Board who are parties to the MSA identify prospective candidates to serve as directors, review candidates’ credentials and qualifications, and interview prospective candidates, in accordance with the terms of the MSA. Subject to the terms of the MSA, the members of the Board also consider and discuss other stockholder recommendations for director nominees. Recommendations for director nominees may come from a wide variety of sources, including stockholders, business contacts, community leaders, other third-party sources and members of management. The Board will initially evaluate any such prospective nominee on the basis of his or her resume and other background information that has been made available to the Board and follow up with the prospective nominee. Except with respect to nominations in accordance with the MSA, the Board does not anticipate that the Company will differentiate evaluating nominees based on the source of their nomination. While the Board will consider candidates recommended by stockholders as discussed above, it has not adopted formal procedures to be followed by stockholders for submitting such recommendations in light of the nomination provisions of the MSA, which provides for identification and selection procedures with respect to all but one seat on the Board at this time.

The Board seeks to attract director nominees of personal integrity whose diversity of business background and experience will represent the interests of all stockholders. There is no specific requirement for minimum qualifications or skills that candidates must possess. Director candidates are evaluated based on a number of qualifications, including their judgment, leadership ability, expertise in the industry, experience developing and analyzing business strategies, financial literacy and risk management skills.

Stockholder Communications with the Board

The Board has established a process for stockholders to send communications to the Board. Stockholders may communicate with the Board generally or a specific director at any time by writing to the Company at 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201, Attn: Corporate Secretary. The Corporate Secretary reviews all messages received, and forwards any message that reasonably appears to be a communication from a stockholder about a matter of stockholder interest that is intended for communication to the Board. Communications are sent as soon as practicable to the director to whom they are addressed, or if addressed to the Board generally, to the Chairman of the Board. Because other appropriate avenues of communication exist for matters that are not of stockholder interest, such as general business complaints or employee grievances, communications that do not relate to matters of stockholder interest are not forwarded to the Board. The Corporate Secretary has the right, but not the obligation, to forward such other communications to appropriate channels within the Company.

14
 

Stockholder Proposals

If a stockholder wishes to submit a proposal for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy for the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the proposal must be received in proper form at the Company’s principal executive offices on or before December 29, 2017 in order to have the proposal included in the proxy materials of the Company for such meeting. If a stockholder wishes to submit a proposal at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act, the stockholder must notify the Company in writing of such proposal on or before March 14, 2018 in order to have that proposal considered at such meeting.

To be in proper form, a stockholder’s notice must include information concerning the proposal. A stockholder who wishes to submit a proposal is encouraged to seek independent counsel with regard to the SEC requirements. The Company may exclude any proposal that does not meet the SEC’s requirements for submitting a proposal, and reserves the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements. Notices of intention to submit proposals for or at the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders should be addressed to the Company at 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201, Attn: Corporate Secretary.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that sets forth legal and ethical standards of conduct applicable to all directors, officers and employees of the Company. The Code of Ethics is available on the Company’s website at http://wilhelmina.com/new-york/investor-relations.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

The Board reviews all relationships and transactions with the Company in which our directors or executive officers or their immediate family members are participants to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest.  The Board is primarily responsible for the development and implementation of processes and controls to obtain information from the directors and executive officers with respect to related party transactions and for then determining, based on the facts and circumstances, whether the Company or a related person has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction.  In addition, the Audit Committee reviews and approves or ratifies any related party transaction that is required to be disclosed pursuant to SEC or Nasdaq rules.  In the course of its review and approval or ratification of a related party transaction, the Audit Committee considers: (i) the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction, (ii) the material terms of the transaction, including, without limitation, the amount and type of transaction, (iii) the importance of the transaction to the related person, (iv) the importance of the transaction to the Company, (v) whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a director or executive officer to act in the best interest of the Company, and (vi) any other matters the Audit Committee deems appropriate. Any member of the Board who is a related person with respect to a transaction under review may not participate in the deliberations or vote respecting approval or ratification of the transaction. (See,Related Party Transactions.)

21


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
15
 
Summary

Compensation Table

of Directors

The Company’s current standard compensation arrangement for non-employee directors permits each non-employee director to elect to receive either (a) an annual cash retainer of $28,000, (b) options to purchase 100,000 shares of the Common Stock at the closing price on the date of grant, or (c) a combination of cash retainer and stock options. During fiscal 2016, each non-employee director elected to receive all of his compensation in cash. The Chairman of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee each receive an additional annual cash retainer of $2,500, and each member of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee receive an additional annual cash retainer of $1,000.

The following table sets forth information with respect toconcerning the compensation earned by ourof the non-employee directors of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

Name

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash ($)

Option Awards ($)1

All Other

Compensation ($)

Total ($)
Clinton J. Coleman28,000------28,000
James A. Dvorak28,000------28,000
Horst-Dieter Esch28,000------28,000
Mark E. Pape31,500------31,500
James C. Roddey31,500------31,500
Jeffrey R. Utz30,000------30,000

1As of December 31, 2016, no stock options were outstanding to any of the non-employee directors.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s current executive officers.  

NameAgePositions with the Company
Mark E. Schwarz56Director and Executive Chairman
William J. Wackermann49Chief Executive Officer
James A. McCarthy40Chief Financial Officer

William J. Wackermann

Mr. Wackermann became the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in January 2016.  He served as Executive Vice President and Publishing Director of Condé Nast, a division of Advance Publications, from 2010 to 2015.  Mr. Wackermann also served as Chief Revenue Officer of Condé Nast in 2015.  In these roles, he was responsible for revenue growth and marketing oversight of several Condé Nast brands, including Glamour, Condé Nast Traveler, W, Details, Bon Appétit and Brides. Mr. Wackermann previously served as Senior Vice President/Publishing Director at Condé Nast from 2008 to 2010 and Vice President/Publisher Glamour at Condé Nast from 2004 to 2008 (Senior Vice President commencing in 2006).

16

James A. McCarthy

Mr. McCarthy was appointed Chief Financial Officer for each of the last two years.  We referCompany effective April 2016. Prior to thesejoining the Company, Mr. McCarthy had since 2009 served as the Controller of Orchard Media, Inc., a music, video and film distribution company that was ultimately acquired by a subsidiary of Sony Corporation. Previously, he had since 1999 been a Senior Manager at the international accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. McCarthy is a Certified Public Accountant licensed in New York.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation earned during the fiscals years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, by each person who served as an executive officers as our named executive officers.

Name and Principal Position
 
Year
 
Salary ($)
 
Bonus ($)
 
Option
Awards
($)
 
All Other
Compensation ($)
 
Total ($)
             
Mark E. Schwarz 2013 150,000 - - - 150,000
Executive Chairman and Former Chief Executive Officer(1)
 2012 150,000 - - - 150,000
             
Alex Vaickus 2013 500,000 - 
273,034(3)
 - 773,034
Chief Executive Officer(2)
 2012 135,416 - 
357,416(3)
 - 492,832
             
John Murray 2013 200,000 - - - 275,000
Chief Financial Officer 2012 200,000 
75,000(4)
 - - 275,000

officer of the Company at any time during fiscal 2016 (the “Named Executive Officers”). 

Name and

Principal Position

YearSalary ($)Bonus ($)

Option

Awards ($)1

All Other

Compensation ($)2

Total ($)

Mark E. Schwarz

Executive Chairman

2016

2015

150,000

150,000

---

---

---

---

---

---

150,000

150,000

       

William J. Wackermann

Chief Executive Officer

2016

2015

466,057

---

---

---

731,893

---

---

---

1,197,950

---

       

James A. McCarthy

Chief Financial Officer

2016

2015

154,358

---

15,000

---

101,151

---

---

---

270,509

---

       

Alex Vaickus3

Chief Executive Officer

2016

2015

32,403

500,000

---

---

---

---

208,333

---

240,736

500,000

       

David S. Chaiken4

Chief Accounting Officer

2016

2015

85,528

275,000

---

---

---

38,949

45,833

---

131,361

313,949

(1)Mr. Schwarz served as Chief Executive Officer throughout 2011 and from January 1 2012 through September 25, 2012, at which time he assumed the title of Executive Chairman.
(2)Mr. Vaickus was appointed Chief Executive Officer on September 25, 2012.
(3)In connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Vaickus was awarded an option to purchase 100,000 shares of our Common Stock with an exercise price of $2.34 per share, a five year vesting schedule (vesting in equal annual increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of the grant) and a ten year term. On September 27, 2013 Mr. Vaickus was awarded an additional option to purchase 100,000 shares of our Common Stock with an exercise price of $3.80 per share, a five year vesting schedule (vesting in equal annual increments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of the grant) and a ten year term These options were granted under the Company’s 2011 Incentive Plan.  Amount reflectsReflects the fair value of theeach stock option grants estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumptions used in calculating this amount are included in Note 10 to the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report Form 10-K. On January 26, 2016, Mr. Wackermann was granted options to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at the fair market value on the date of grant of $6.50 per share. On April 25, 2016, Mr. McCarthy was granted options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock at the fair market value on the date of grant of $7.36 per share. Both grants vest in five equal annual installments and expire ten years from the date of grant.

(4)2Represents a cash bonus paid topost-employment severance payments.

3The employment of Mr. Murray.Vaickus was terminated as of January 26, 2016. All options held by Mr. Vaickus terminated unexercised in connection with the termination of his employment.

4Mr. Chaiken was appointed Chief Accounting Officer on January 23, 2015, and his employment was terminated on April 22, 2016. All options held by Mr. Chaiken terminated unexercised in connection with the termination of his employment.

Employment Agreements and Arrangements

Mr. VaickusWackermann entered into an Employment Agreement with the Company on August 29, 2012 and was subsequently appointed Chief Executive Officer on September 25, 2012.effective January 26, 2016. Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. VaickusWackermann is paid (a) a grossbase annual salary of $500,000 and (b) certain annual performance bonuses ranging from between 7.5% and 15% of EBITDA (earningsearnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)amortization (“EBITDA”) of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries in excess of certain thresholds starting at $5.5 million per year. The applicable calculation of EBITDA is to includeincludes Mr. Vaickus’Wackermann’s base salary and other compensation related expense, but excludeexcludes the relevant bonus, for purposes of determining whether an EBITDA threshold is met. In accordance with the Employment Agreement, Mr. Vaickus will also receiveWackermann has received two consecutive annual option grants of 100,000options to purchase 200,000 shares (on a split adjusted basis) of our Common Stock under the Company’s 2011 Incentive Plan tocommon stock at the fair market value on the date of grant, which stock options vest ratably in five (5) equal increments beginning on the first anniversary ofannual installments and terminate ten years from the date of grant. The first such grant was made on September 25, 2012 andSubsequent grants will be determined in the second grant was made on September 27, 2013.discretion of the Board of Directors. The term of the Employment Agreement is two (2) years, subject to an annual evergreen thereafterone year renewal unless notice of nonrenewalnon-renewal is provided by either party prior to ninety (90) days before the end of the applicable term.

17

 
22


In

Under his Employment Agreement, in the event that Mr. Vaickus’Wackermann’s employment is terminated without “cause”cause or for “good reason”, Mr. Vaickusgood reason, he is entitled to receive continued salary for the lesser of (1)(a) the number ofremaining months remaining on the term of the Employment Agreement and (2)(b) the Number of Qualifying Months (as herein defined).Months. The “Number of Qualifying Months” means three (3) months plus, for each twelve (12) month renewal period that occurred under the Employment Agreement, one (1) additional month. “Cause” includesPursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Wackermann is restricted from competing with the Company for a breachperiod of one year from the date of termination and is subject to certain covenants of confidential and non-solicitation.

Mr. McCarthyhasentered into an employment letter with the Company confirming his at-will employment.  The employment letter provides for a starting base salary of $225,000 per year and a discretionary annual bonus targeted at 30% of base salary based on the achievement of financial, strategic and/or personal goals to be set by the Board of Directors. Mr. McCarthy is eligible to participate in the Company’s 2015 Incentive Plan and is entitled to all other benefits offered by the Company to its employees.  In accordance with the employment letter, Mr. McCarthy was initially granted options to purchase 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant, which stock options vest in five equal annual installments and terminate ten years from the date of grant. In the event Mr. McCarthy’s employment with the Company is terminated without cause, he will be entitled to receive 60 days of base salary. Pursuant to the employment letter, Mr. McCarthy is restricted from competing with the Company for a period of one year from the date of termination and is subject to certain covenants of confidential and non-solicitation.

Mr. Vaickus entered into an Employment Agreement with the Company on August 29, 2012 and was subsequently appointed Chief Executive Officer on September 25, 2012.  The Employment Agreement provided for Mr. Vaickus to be paid (a) a base annual salary of $500,000, and (b) an annual performance bonus ranging from 7.5% to 15% of pre-bonus EBITDA (as defined therein) in excess of certain thresholds starting at $5.5 million per year. The Employment Agreement also provided for the annual grant to Mr. Vaickus of options to purchase 100,000 shares of the Common Stock at an exercise equal to the closing price on the date of grant, with such options to vest in five equal annual installments and terminate ten years from the grant date.

The employment of Mr. Vaickus was terminated by the Company as of January 26, 2016. In accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement, that remains uncured within ten (10) days after a written demand of performance is delivered identifying the manner in whichCompany paid to Mr. Vaickus has not performed or any violationhis base salary of $41,667 per month for five months following the restrictive covenants set forthdate of termination. All options held by Mr. Vaickus terminated unexercised in connection with the termination of his employment. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, without referenceMr. Vaickus was restricted from competing with the Company for a period of one year from the date of termination and is subject to certain covenants of confidential and non-solicitation.

18

Mr. Chaiken was appointed Chief Accounting Officer of the Company on January 23, 2015, pursuant to an Offer Letter providing for an annual base salary of $275,000, increasing to $300,000 upon the satisfaction of certain objectives.  Mr. Chaiken was also eligible to earn an annual cash bonus of up to $40,000 based on the achievement of certain targets. In accordance with the Offer Letter, Mr. Vaickus was also granted options to purchase 10,000 shares of the Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the closing price on the date of grant, such options to vest in five equal annual installments and terminate ten years from the grant date.

The employment of Mr. Chaiken was terminated by the Company as of April 22, 2016. Pursuant to the terms of the Offer Letter, Mr. Chaiken was paid his base salary of $45,833 per month for 60 days following the date of termination. All options held by Mr. Chaiken terminated unexercised in connection with the termination of his employment. Pursuant to the Offer Letter, Mr. Chaiken was restricted from competing with the Company for a period of one year from the date of termination and is subject to certain covenants of confidential and non-solicitation.

Except as described above, the Company has no plans or arrangements that provide for payment to any cure period.  “Good reason” meansNamed Executive Officer in connection with the resignation, retirement or other termination of such Named Executive Officer or a reduction of Mr. Vaickus’ salary.


The Employment Agreement also contains certain non-compete and non-solicitation provisions.

Messrs. Schwarz and Murray are employed on an “at will” basis and do not have employment, severance or change in control agreements withof the Company.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Except for the severance arrangements under Mr. Vaickus’ Employment Agreement as described above, we have no plans or other arrangements in respect of remuneration received or that may be received by our executive officers to compensate such officers in the event of termination of employment (as a result of resignation, retirement or change in control) or other events following a change in control.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

The following table sets forth certain information regarding equity awards held by the named executive officersNamed Executive Officers as of December 31, 2013.

  
Option Awards
 
Name
 
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable
  
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable
  
Option Exercise Price
($)
  
Option Expiration Date
 
              
Mark E. Schwarz  -   -    -   - 
                  
Alex Vaickus  40,000   60,000(1)   2.34  9/25/22 
   20,000   80,000(2)   3.80  9/27/23 
                  
John Murray  2,500   -    5.60  6/18/14 
_______________
2016, consisting solely of unexercised stock options.

Name

Number of Securities

Underlying Unexercised Options1

Option Exercise

Price ($)

Option

Expiration Date

Exercisable (#)Unexercisable (#)
Mark E. Schwarz------------
William J. Wackermann---200,0006.5001/26/2026
James A. McCarthy---30,0007.3604/25/2026

1All outstanding options vest in five equal annual installments from the date of grant.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company’s corporate headquarters are located at 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201, which are also the offices of NCM. Pursuant to a services agreement with NCM, the Company receives the use of NCM’s facilities and equipment, as well as accounting, legal and administrative services from employees of NCM, on a month-to-month basis for a fixed fee of $2,500 per month. The Company paid $30,000 to NCM in each of fiscal 2016 and 2015 pursuant to the services agreement. Mr. Schwarz is the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager of NCM, which is the general partner of Newcastle LP. Messrs. Coleman and Dvorak are Managing Directors of NCM.

 (1)19options were granted September 25, 2012 and vest in annual installments of 20,000 on each anniversary.
 
(2)options were granted September 27, 2013 and vest in annual installments of 20,000 on each anniversary.

23

Director Compensation
For

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The firm of Montgomery Coscia Greilich LLP (“MCG”) has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2016 and 2015 fiscal years. The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by MCG for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal yearyears ended December 31, 2013,2016 and 2015, as well as fees billed for other services rendered by MCG during each period.

 Fiscal 2016Fiscal 2015
Audit Fees1$203,300$165,000
Audit-Related Fees------
Tax Fees2 $4,306$41,094
All Other Fees------

1Represents fees for audit of the financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and review of financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. A portion of the fees attributable to the indicated fiscal year were paid in the subsequent fiscal year.

2Represents fees for professional services relating to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

All services to be performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee.  Limited amounts of our non-employeeservices (other than audit, review or attest services) may be approved by one or more members of the Audit Committee pursuant to authority delegated by the Audit Committee, provided each such approved service is reported to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting. All of the services performed by MCG for the 2016 and 2015 fiscal years were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee of the Board is responsible for providing independent, objective oversight of the Company’s accounting functions and internal controls. The Audit Committee is currently composed of three directors was entitled to compensation consisting of $28,000 in fees, stock options to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock, orand acts under a combination of cashwritten charter approved and options.adopted by the Board. The Audit Committee reviews its charter on an annual basis. Each of our non-employee directors elected to receive their annual compensationthe members is independent as defined by all Nasdaq and SEC requirements. The Board annually reviews the relevant definitions of independence for 2013 all in cash.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, Mark Pape earnedaudit committee members and makes an annual cash retainerdetermination of $2,500 for his servicethe independence of Audit Committee members.

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is an “audit committee financial expert,” as the Chairmandefined by SEC rules and regulations. This designation does not impose any duty, obligation or liability that is greater than is generally imposed on a member of the Audit Committee and $1,000 for his servicethe Board, and designation as a memberan audit committee financial expert does not affect the duty, obligation or liability of the Compensation Committee.  In addition, James Roddey earned an annual cash retainer of $1,500 for his service as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and $2,000 for his service as aany member of the Audit Committee.


The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation earned by or awarded to each non-employee director who served on the Board during the year ended December 31, 2013.
Name
 
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
  
All Other Compensation ($)
  
Total ($)
 
          
Horst-Dieter Esch  28,000   -   28,000 
             
Jeffrey Utz(1)
  7,000   -   7,000 
             
Clinton Coleman  28,000   -   28,000 
             
James Dvorak  28,000   -   28,000 
             
Mark Pape  28,000   -   28,000 
             
James Roddey(2)
  28,000   -   28,000 
_______________
(1)Elected to the Board September 2013.
(2)Mr. Roddey was not a Board nominee for the 2013 Annual Meeting held on September 26, 2013 and accordingly ceased to serve on the Board as of the 2013 Annual Meeting.  Mr. Roddey was subsequently re-appointed to the Board on November 19, 2013.  The Company does not pro-rate quarterly cash fees assuming the director serves for a material portion of the applicable quarter.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
2011 Incentive Plan
On May 2, 2011, our Board approved the Wilhelmina International, Inc. 2011 Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”).  The 2011 Plan is effective as of May 2, 2011 and was approved by a majority of our stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting. The 2011 Plan is intended as an incentive to retain and to attract directors, officers, consultants, advisors and employees, as well as to encourage a sense of proprietorship and stimulate the active interest of such persons in our development and financial success.

24

The 2011 Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, and other equity incentives, including stock or stock based awards (collectively, the “Plan Rights”), to persons eligible to participate in the 2011 Plan.  The 2011 Plan shall satisfy the performance-based compensation exception to the limitation on our tax deductions imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code, with respect to those options and stock appreciation rights for which qualification for such exception is intended (“Section 162(m) Grants”).
In the event option grants are intended to qualify as Section 162(m) Grants, the requirements as to stockholder approval set forth in Section 162(m) of the Code must be satisfied.
A total of 300,000 shares of our Common Stock are subject to the 2011 Plan.  The maximum number of shares that may be subject to options and stock appreciation rights granted under the 2011 Plan to any individual in any calendar year may not exceed 100,000.  Should any Plan Right expire or be canceled prior to its exercise or vesting in full or should the number of shares of Common Stock to be delivered upon the exercise or vesting in full of a Plan Right be reduced for any reason, the shares of Common Stock subject to such Plan Right may be subject to future Plan Rights under the Plan, unless such reissuance is inconsistent with the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code.
The 2011 Plan is to be administered by a committee consisting of two or more directors appointed by our Board (the “Plan Committee”), which may be the Compensation Committee of the Board.  Under the 2011 Plan, the Plan Committee will be comprised solely of “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, which individuals will serve at the pleasure of our Board.  In the event that for any reason the Plan Committee is unable to act or if the Plan Committee at the time of any grant, award or other acquisition under the 2011 Plan does not consist of two or more “non-employee directors,” or if there is no such Plan Committee, then the 2011 Plan will be administered by our Board, provided that grants to our Chief Executive Officer or to any covered employee within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code that are intended to qualify as Section 162(m) Grants may only be granted by a properly constituted Plan Committee, subject to ratification by our Board.  Except in the case of Section 162(m) Grants (the recipients, terms and conditions of which the Plan Committee has full power and authority to determine, subject to Board ratification), the recipients, terms and conditions of grants under the 2011 Plan are recommended by the Plan Committee to the Board for approval.  The Plan Committee will interpret the 2011 Plan and all Plan Rights granted thereunder and make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2011 Plan.  Our Board has designated the Compensation Committee of the Board as the Plan Committee.
The 2011 Plan provides for the early expiration of options and stock appreciation rights in the event of certain terminations of employment of the recipients thereof.  Options and stock appreciation rights granted under the 2011 Plan are not transferable and may be exercised solely by the recipient thereof during his lifetime or after his death by the person or persons entitled thereto under his will or the laws of descent and distribution.  Upon the occurrence of a “change of control” (as defined in the 2011 Plan), the Plan Committee may accelerate the vesting and/or exercisability of certain Plan Rights under the Plan.  The 2011 Plan contains a clawback provision that permits the Plan Committee to, in all appropriate circumstances and in accordance with guidance issued by the SEC, require reimbursement of any annual incentive payment including incentive options and nonqualified options to an executive officer where:  (a) the payment was predicated upon achieving certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a substantial restatement of our financial statements filed with the SEC; and (b) a lower payment would have been made to the executive based upon the restated financial results.  The 2011 Plan expires on May 1, 2021, and no grants may be made pursuant to the 2011 Plan after such date.

25

1996 Employee Comprehensive Stock Plan and 1996 Non-Employee Director Plan
We had previously adopted the 1996 Employee Comprehensive Stock Plan (“1996 Comprehensive Plan”) and the 1996 Non-Employee Director Plan (the “1996 Director Plan”) under which our officers, employees and affiliates, and our non-employee directors, respectively, were eligible to receive stock option grants.  Our employees were also eligible to receive restricted stock grants under the 1996 Comprehensive Plan.  We previously reserved 725,000 and 65,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance pursuant to the 1996 Comprehensive Plan and the 1996 Director Plan, respectively.  The 1996 Comprehensive Plan and the 1996 Director Plan expired on July 10, 2006, and therefore we are no longer permitted to grant new options under either plan.  The expiration of the 1996 Comprehensive Plan and the 1996 Director Plan does not affect outstanding option grants, which will expire in accordance with their terms.

Equity Compensation Plan Table
The following table summarizes the equity compensation plans under which the Common Stock may be issued as of December 31, 2013:
Plan Category
 
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)
  
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)
  
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  202,500  $3.00   100,000 
             
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  n/a   n/a   n/a 
             
Total  202,500  $3.00   100,000 
26


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Mark Pape, James Roddey and Jeffrey Utz.  Messrs. Pape, Roddey and Utz are independent under the listing standards of Nasdaq with respect to board of directors and audit committee membership.
Board.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the consolidatedCompany’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 with both management and Montgomery Coscia, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.  In its discussion, management has represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Audit Committee meets with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.  The Audit Committee has2016. It also discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firmMCG the matters required to be discussed by the statementStatement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”(the “PCAOB”) in Rule 3200T.
The. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firmMCG required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’sMCG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has considered andthe Audit Committee discussed with Montgomery Coscia suchMCG that firm’s independence.

20
 

The Audit Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board that the Company’s financial statements be included in the Company’s annual report. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation, and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws, and regulations. The Company’s independent auditor, MCG, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles.

Based on the discussions with MCG concerning the audit, the financial statement review, and other such matters deemed relevant and appropriate by the Audit Committee’s review of the audited financial statements and the various discussions noted above,Committee, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

2016 be included in the Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.

Submitted to the Board by the undersigned members of the Audit Committee.

 AUDIT COMMITTEEAudit Committee
  
 Mark Pape (Chairman)
 

James Roddey

Jeffrey Utz

27


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Requirements for Stockholder Proposals to be Considered for Inclusion in our Proxy Materials
Stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information as of the Exchange Act (“Rule 14a-8”) to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to our next Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received at 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201, Attn: Corporate Secretary, no later than [*].  We have not yet determined when we will hold our next Annual Meeting of Stockholders.  If we determine to hold such meeting more than 30 days from the first anniversaryRecord Date, concerning beneficial ownership of the date of the Annual Meeting, we will publicly announce such date to stockholders as soon as reasonably practicable.

Requirements for Stockholder Proposals Outside the Scope of Rule 14a-8
Any stockholder of record entitled to vote in the election of directors may submit proposals for business to be considered by the stockholdersCommon Stock of the Company at any meeting of stockholders if written notice of such stockholder’s intent to submit such proposal or proposals has been given, either by personal delivery or by United States mail, postage prepaid,by:

Any person or group known to beneficially own more than 5% of the Common Stock;
Each current director and current executive officer of the Company; and
All current directors and current executive officers as a group.

The information provided in the table is based on the Company’s records, information filed with the SEC and other information provided to the SecretaryCompany. The number of shares beneficially owned by each person or group is determined under SEC rules, and the Company atinformation is not necessarily indicative of ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the principal officeperson or group has sole or shared voting or investment power and includes any shares that the person or group has the right to acquire within 60 days after the determination date through the exercise of the Company (i)any stock option or other right. Unless otherwise indicated, (a) all persons have sole voting and investment power (or share such powers with their spouse) with respect to any proposal to be introduced at an annual meeting of stockholders, not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, or [*], for next year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is advancedshares shown as beneficially owned by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder must be so delivered not earlier than the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made, and (ii) with respect to any proposal to be introduced at a special meeting of stockholders, the close of business on the seventh day following the date on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.  Each such notice shall set forth (a) the name and address of the stockholder who intends to introduce the proposal and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is to be introduced;them, (b) the text ofmailing address for all persons is the proposal to be introduced (including the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and in the event such proposal is to amend the Bylaws, the text of the proposed amendment), the reasons for introducing the proposal at the meeting and any material interest of the stockholder in the proposal; (c) the class and number of shares of stock of the Company which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder and such beneficial owner; and (d) a representationsame as that the stockholder is a holder of record of stock of the Company, and intends to appear in person or by proxy at(c) the meeting to introduce the proposal or proposals specified in the notice.  The chairpersondirectors and current executive officers have not pledged as security any of the meeting may refuseshares beneficially owned by them.

21

 No. of Shares 
 BeneficiallyPercent
Beneficial OwnerOwnedOf Class
   
5% Beneficial Owners:  
     Newcastle Partners, L.P.1,3 2,430,72545.2
     Newcastle Capital Management, L.P.1  
     Newcastle Capital Group, L.L.C.1  
     NCM Services, Inc.1  
     Schwarz 2012 Family Trust1  
     Mark E. Schwarz1  
     Clinton J. Coleman1  
     James A. Dvorak1  
   
     Lorex Investment AG2,3 1,033,85519.2
     Horst-Dieter Esch2,3  
     Peter Marty2  
   
     Wynnefield Capital, Inc.4 305,9985.7
     Wynnefield Capital Management, LLC4  
     Wynnefield Capital, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan4  
     Wynnefield Small Cap Value Offshore Fund, Ltd.4  
     Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, L.P. I4  
     Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, L.P.4  
     Nelson Obus4  
     Joshua Landes4  
   
     Ralph Bartel5306,4255.7
   
Directors and Current Executive Officers:  
     Mark E. Schwarz1,3 2,430,72545.2
     Clinton J. Coleman5 ------
     James A. Dvorak5 ------
     Horst Dieter Esch2,3 1,033,85519.2
     Mark E. Pape  ------
     James C. Roddey ------
     Jeffrey R. Utz ------
     William J. Wackermann6 40,000*
     James A. McCarthy6 6,000*
   All directors and Named Executive Officers 3,510,58064.7

*       Less than 1%.

1All shares are held by Newcastle LP. The general partner of Newcastle LP is NCM, the general partner of NCM is Newcastle Capital Group, L.L.C. (“NCG”), the sole member of NCG is NCM Services, Inc. (“NCMS”), the sole shareholder of NCMS is the Schwarz 2012 Family Trust (“Schwarz Trust”) and the sole trustee of the Schwarz Trust is Mark E. Schwarz. Further, Newcastle LP, NCM, NCG, NCMS, the Schwarz Trust, Mr. Schwarz, Mr. Coleman and Mr. Dvorak may be considered a “group” for purposes of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, each of NCM, NCG, NCMS, the Schwarz Trust, Mr. Schwarz, Mr. Coleman and Mr. Dvorak may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of Common Stock directly owned by Newcastle LP. Each of NCM, NCG, NCM Services, the Schwarz Trust, Mr. Schwarz, Mr. Coleman and Mr. Dvorak disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Newcastle LP except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interest therein.

22

2All shares are held by Lorex. Mr. Esch is the sole stockholder of Lorex and shares voting and dispositive power over the shares held by Lorex with Peter Marty, its sole officer and director. Accordingly, each of Mr. Esch and Mr. Marty may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of Common Stock directly owned by Lorex. The address of Lorex is c/o Treuhand – u. Revisionsgesellschaft Mattig-Suter and Postner AG, Industriestrasse 22, Zug, CH-6302, Switzerland. The address of Dieter Esch is Carretera Transpeninsular Km. 27.5, San Jose del Cabo, B.C.S. Mexico 23400. The address of Peter Marty is c/o Mattig-Suter und Partner, Bahnhofstrasse 28, Schwyz, CH-6431, Switzerland.

3Newcastle LP, Lorex and Mr. Esch are parties to a Mutual Support Agreement pursuant to which they have agreed to vote their shares in a certain manner with respect to the election of directors of the Company. (See,Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors – Arrangements Regarding Election of Directors.) Newcastle LP, on the one hand, and Lorex and Mr. Esch, on the other hand, each disclaim beneficial ownership of shares held by the other.

4As reported in Schedule 13G filed February 14, 2017. Includes 275,065 shares held by Wynnefield Capital, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, 5,886 shares held by Wynnefield Small Cap Value Offshore Fund, Ltd., 15,644 shares held by Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, L.P. I and 9,403 shares held by Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, L.P. Messrs. Obus and Landes are each co-managing member of Wynnefield Capital Management, LLC (the general partner of Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, L.P. and Wynnefield Partners Small Cap Value, L.P. I), a principal executive officer of Wynnefield Capital, Inc. (the investment manager of Wynnefield Small Cap Value Offshore Fund, Ltd.), and a co-trustee of Wynnefield Capital, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan. The address of all such persons is 450 Seventh Avenue, Suite 509, New York, New York 10123.

5As reported in Schedule 13G filed December 14, 2016. Mr. Bartel’s address is Casella postale 823, 6612 Ascona , Switzerland.

6Consists solely of shares which may be acquired pursuant to stock options exercisable on or within 60 days after the Record Date.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The Company's executive officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Common Stock are required to acknowledgefile reports of ownership and changes in ownership of the introduction of any stockholder proposal not made in complianceCommon Stock with the foregoing procedure.

28

Requirements for Stockholder Nominations of Directors
Any stockholder of record entitledSEC. Based solely upon information provided to vote in the election of directors of the Company may nominateby individual directors, only if written notice of such stockholder’s intent to make such nomination or nominations has been given, either by personal delivery or by United States mail, postage prepaid, to the Secretary ofexecutive officers and beneficial owners, the Company at the principal office of the Company (i)believes that all such reports were timely filed during and with respect to an election to be held at an annual meeting of stockholders, not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, or [*], for next year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder must be so delivered not earlier than the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made, and (ii) with respect to an election to be held at a special meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of electing directors, the close of business on the seventh day following the date on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.  Each such notice shall set forth (a) the name and address of the stockholder who intends to make the nomination and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made and of the person or persons to be nominated; (b) the class and number of shares of stock of the Company which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder and such beneficial owner; (c) a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of stock of the Company and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; (d) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the stockholder; (e) such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such stockholder as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the SEC, had the nominee been nominated or intended to be nominated, by the board of directors; and (f) the written consent of each nominee to serve as a director of the Company if so elected.  The chairperson of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure.
PROXY SOLICITATION
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

Proxy Solicitation

This solicitation of proxies is being made on behalf of the Board and the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing this Proxy Statement is being paid by the Company. In addition to solicitation by mail, Company directors, officers and employees (none of whom will receive any compensation therefor in addition to their regular compensation) may solicit proxies by telephone or other means of communication. Arrangements will also be made with brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries that hold the voting securities of record for the forwarding of solicitation materials to the beneficial owners thereof. The Company will reimburse such brokers, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection therewith.

23
 
ANNUAL REPORT

Annual Report

The 20132016 Annual Report is being sent with this Proxy Statement to each stockholder. The 20132016 Annual Report is also available at http://www.wilhelmina.com/investor-relations.aspx.  The 2013wilhelmina.com/new-york/investor-relations. However, the 2016 Annual Report however, is not to be regarded as part of the proxy soliciting material.materials.

24
 
29


PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED NOVEMBER [*], 2014
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for
Wilhelmina International, Inc.’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on
December 18, 2014.  The Proxy Statement and the 2013 Annual Report
are Available at [________]

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

PROXY

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF

SHAREHOLDERS OF

WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC.


Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To be Held on December 18, 2014

TO BE HELD JUNE 13, 2017

The undersigned a stockholderhereby appoints Mark E. Schwarz, William J. Wackermann and James A. McCarthy, and each of Wilhelmina International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby appoint John Murraythem individually, as the truelawful agents and lawful attorney and proxyProxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, for and in the name, placehereby authorizes each of them to represent and steadvote, as designated below, all shares of Common Stock of Wilhelmina International, Inc. held of record by the undersigned to vote allas of April 21, 2017, at the shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), of the Company that the undersigned would be entitled to vote on all matters that may properly come before the Company’s Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders to be held at the offices of the Company located at 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201, on December 18, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., local time,June 13, 2017, or at any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (THE “BOARD”) RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 2.  PROPERLY EXECUTED PROXIES WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED.  IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN, SUCH PROXIES WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSAL 2.

adjournment thereof. The undersigned hereby revokes all previous proxies relating to the shares covered hereby and confirms all that said Proxies may do by virtue hereof.

1.To elect seven directorsELECTION OF DIRECTORS:

[  ]

FOR all nominees listed below

(except as marked to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify.contrary)

[  ]WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed below

Instructions: Towithhold authority to vote for any nominee, mark the space beside the nominee's name with an "X".

Mark E. Schwarz   _____FOR ALL NOMINEES  [  ]Clinton J. Coleman   _____WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO  [  ]James A. Dvorak   _____FOR ALL NOMINEES EXCEPT  [  ]Horst-Dieter Esch   _____
  VOTE FOR ALL NOMINEES
Mark E. Pape        _____James C. Roddey     _____Jeffrey R. Utz        _____ 

2.APPROVAL OF PREFERRED STOCK ELIMINATION AMENDMENT:
 Nominees:[     ]   FOR01 Clinton Coleman[     ]   AGAINST05 Mark E. Schwarz[     ]   ABSTAIN
  02 James Dvorak06 Jeffrey Utz
3,APPROVAL OF COMMON STOCK REDUCTION AMENDMENT:
[     ]   FOR[     ]   AGAINST[     ]   ABSTAIN
  03 Horst-Dieter Esch07 James Roddey
4.RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM: 
 [     ]   FOR04 Mark Pape[     ]   AGAINST[     ]   ABSTAIN

TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL NOMINEE(S), MARK “FOR ALL NOMINEES EXCEPT” AND WRITE THE NUMBER(S) OF THE NOMINEE(S) ON THE LINE BELOW:

2.5.To approve a proposalOTHER BUSINESS: In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to ratifyvote on any other matter which may properly come before the appointment of Montgomery Coscia Greilich, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

FOR   [  ]AGAINST   [  ]ABSTAIN   [  ]
3.   To transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting.


WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING AND REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU OWN, PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE (WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES).

If

When properly executed, this proxy will be voted as directed above and in the discretion of themanner directed herein named attorneys and proxies, their substitutes, or any of them with respect to any matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting that are unknown to the Company a reasonable time before this solicitation. The undersigned stockholder hereby revokes any proxy or proxies heretofore given by the undersigned for the Annual Meeting and hereby ratifies and confirms all action the herein named attorneys and proxies, their substitutes, or any of them may lawfully take by virtue hereof.




DATED:__________________________



(Print Full Name of Stockholder)
(Signature of Stockholder)
(Signature if held jointly)

NOTE:shareholder. IF NO DIRECTION IS SPECIFIED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTEDFOR THE ELECTION OF ALL DIRECTORS PROPOSED IN ITEM 1,FOR APPROVAL OF THE PREFERRED STOCK ELIMINATION AMENDMENT,FOR APPROVAL OF THE COMMON STOCK REDUCTION AMENDMENT ANDFOR THE RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.

Please sign below exactly as your name or names appear hereon.shares are held of record. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please indicate the capacity in which signing.  When signinggive full title as joint tenants, all parties in the joint tenancy should sign.  When a proxy is given bysuch. If a corporation, or partnership, it should be signed withplease sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by a duly authorized officer.





person.

Date: __________________________ , 2017
Signature
Title
Signature, if held jointly:

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY, USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE CHECK THIS BOX IF YOU INTEND TO BE PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS.